Compare performance (136 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD ETP3 or MG ZS?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MG ZS is considerably cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the BYD ETP3 costs 31,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,629 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers noticeably more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD ETP3 delivers a bit more torque with 180 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 32 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: MG ZS offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is markedly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,640 kg. The difference is around 310 kg.
When it comes to payload, the BYD ETP3 carries clearly more – 780 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 310 kg.
The MG ZS stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD ETP3 is a smart, no-nonsense electric offering that blends everyday practicality with a quietly modern design that won’t embarrass you in the supermarket car park. It’s ideal for buyers after fuss-free electric mobility — efficient, clever and just playful enough to make city driving a little more fun.
detailsThe MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
31,600 £
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
233 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,640 kg
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,460 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,720 mm
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
|
Height
1,875 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,500 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
780 kg
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
100 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
180 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
MG
|