VS

MG ZS vs MG HS comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or MG HS?

MG ZS vs MG HS: Key differences

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

MG HS

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

ZS

MG ZS vs MG HS: the real‑world differences that matter

The MG ZS and MG HS chase the same family‑SUV brief, but they go about it differently. In this MG ZS vs MG HS comparison, the ZS plays the value-packed, easy-to-park all-rounder, while the HS leans into size, serenity and electric running if you choose the plug-in. Day to day, that means contrasting characters on the road, different cabin moods, and distinct ownership costs. We cut through the spec sheets to explain how each MG actually feels to live with. By the end, you’ll know which one fits your routes, your driveway and your budget.

HS

Driving character: nippy city tool or relaxed cruiser

The MG ZS feels lighter on its feet in town, pulling away smoothly and darting through gaps with an eager, hybrid-tinged step-off. Push harder and the ZS gets vocal, delivering pace with a bit more grit and a firmer edge over broken surfaces. The MG HS counters with easy, effortless shove and a calmer power delivery, especially in the plug-in hybrid where electric torque does the heavy lifting. At speed, the HS settles into a lazy lope, while its steering and body control stay safe but a touch vague; the ZS is tidier but more restless. If you crave breezy urban moves, the ZS feels handier; if you value unruffled progress, the HS is the more relaxing companion.

ZS

Ride and refinement: firmness versus hush

The MG ZS prioritises control, which keeps the body in check but lets sharp edges and joints through more clearly. On the motorway, wind and tyre noise creep in, so you’ll turn the radio up sooner. The MG HS smooths the big stuff better and keeps the powertrain quieter, so it feels more mature over distance, though coarse-road roar can still intrude. Net result: the ZS is fine for mixed commutes and school runs, while the HS takes the sting out of longer trips and heavy traffic with a softer, quieter demeanour.

HS

Space and practicality: clever boot versus big back seat

Both MG ZS and MG HS spoil rear passengers with generous knee room and easy-access ISOFIX, so adults and child seats are well served in either. The MG ZS’s boot is usefully shaped and straightforward to load, even if the parcel shelf and underfloor storage solutions feel basic. The MG HS offers wide-opening rear doors and a roomier overall feel, but in plug-in form its boot is shallower and the load lip is higher, and useful tie-downs are missing. Pack pushchairs or weekly shops and the ZS’s simpler, lower load bay is the path of least resistance. Plan frequent family road trips and the HS’s bigger cabin pays you back once everyone’s belted in.

ZS

Cabin feel and tech: honest and simple or plusher but slower

The MG ZS cabin is robust and straightforward, with easy-to-clean materials and an interface that’s simple to grasp, if short on wireless niceties. Some climate and drive functions live in the screen, and smartphone mirroring is cable-only, but it’s quick to get along with. The MG HS looks and feels a notch more upmarket with softer touchpoints and a calmer ambience, yet its infotainment can be laggy with small icons that demand patience. Both load you up with driver assists and cameras; the HS just wraps it in a slightly more premium sheen, while the ZS keeps the learning curve and faff lower.

HS

Costs, efficiency and buyer fit: plug in or plug away

The MG ZS undercuts the MG HS by a healthy margin, and its full-hybrid setup sips fuel convincingly in town and on gentle A-roads. The MG HS can slash running costs if you plug it in regularly and cover most local miles on electricity; skip the cable and its petrol thirst catches up. If you’re budget-conscious, parking in tight streets and want dependable low running costs without changing habits, the ZS is the smarter everyday pick. If you have a home charger, crave a calmer motorway demeanour and want the most serene school run, the HS makes more sense. With those priorities clear, the technical comparison that follows will help confirm which MG’s compromises align best with your life.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG ZS is substantially cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the MG HS costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,000 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG HS uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 4.6 L/100km.

HS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS offers markedly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG HS delivers clearly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 202 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is clearly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,735 kg. The difference is around 405 kg.

When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries moderately more – 470 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG HS is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
HS

MG HS

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 224 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 100 km
MG ZS
MG HS

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details

MG HS

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
MG ZS
MG HS

Costs and Consumption

Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
14 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
507 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
Brand
MG
Brand
MG
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.