VS

BYD Tang vs Skoda Elroq comparison

Compare performance (517 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (64,300 £ vs 32,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Tang or Skoda Elroq?

BYD Tang vs Skoda Elroq: Key differences

BYD Tang

  • markedly more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Elroq

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • visibly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tang

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Elroq is substantially cheaper – starting at 32,000 £ , while the BYD Tang costs 64,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,237 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Elroq is significantly more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 24 kWh/100km for the BYD Tang. That’s a difference of about 8.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 574 km, about 44 km more than the BYD Tang.

Elroq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang offers markedly more power – delivering 517 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Elroq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Tang delivers only slightly more torque with 680 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 1 Nm more.

Tang

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: BYD Tang offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Elroq is visibly lighter – 2,036 kg compared to 2,630 kg. The difference is around 594 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers considerably more boot space – 470 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 235 L.

When it comes to payload, the BYD Tang carries marginally more – 575 kg compared to 549 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Elroq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £32,000
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 441 - 574 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Elroq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the Skoda Elroq and the Skoda Epiq helps you weigh practical, compact crossover usability against a more spacious, tech-focused alternative from Skoda. I’ll highlight the key differences in space, efficiency, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the one that fits your needs.
BYD Tang
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BYD Tang

The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.

details
8ee4e329-3f72-45c5-9cb4-b63b5ddb555e
de335338-ec26-419d-842a-9f53ec65c2c6
9fcec901-74bd-4e0f-8761-2897e2f597bf
24737df2-4e98-4799-b7e2-d4d5c2437265
c342d66a-80aa-4960-abc4-26de29271816

Reviews BYD Tang

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Elroq

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

details
1_skoda_elroq_166e0554
2_skoda_elroq_b393d405
28_skoda_elroq_3a5d05f5

Reviews Skoda Elroq

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Dingo
7 Aug 2026, 22:34:08

A good all-round car for anyone who can cough up €45,000. Essentially the proverbial jack-of-all-trades!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
MASSIMO
10 Jul 2026, 08:32:55

The Skoda Elroq is more maneuverable in the city, easier to park than a Tesla, it doesn’t suffer from curbs that sometimes touch the front, it handles steep, poorly made garage ramps without problems, uses traditional distance sensors that are very reliable, and it’s a European product.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dirk
16 May 2026, 17:53:06

For me personally, compared directly with the ID4 "GTX", the Elroq is the slightly more mature and better-thought-out car for everyday use. It offers better ride comfort, software that runs a bit more smoothly for me, and by far the nicer design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gerry
15 May 2026, 09:17:17

First electric buy, so glad we chose the Elroq. Everything is so intuitive, car very spacious comfortable and nicely appointed, everything just feels right. Turning circle of 9.3M is so useful for such a largish car. Only small gripe is it's has quite a bit of road noise at 100KPH plus, absolutely fine below .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Caelin
14 May 2026, 14:15:42

EV built for 80 km/h roads; range is very disappointing if you use the highway daily. You won't find this in the specifications. Which means in hindsight it wasn't the right choice.
Comfort fine.
Car catches a lot of wind; a lot of wind noise/whistling.
It's a shame that you have to reset a number of functions every time you start; no automatic memory.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the VW ID.3 and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a nimble, hatchback-style EV focused on urban driving or a slightly more spacious, crossover-style model prioritizing practicality. This comparison looks at range, interior space, driving feel and overall value to help …
VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Elroq helps you decide between two different approaches to modern motoring. I’ll focus on range, interior space, driving dynamics, technology and ownership costs so you can pick the one that best matches your priorities.
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Škoda Elroq are close rivals in the small-to-compact SUV segment — this quick comparison will help you spot the practical differences that matter. The Kona is a nimble, tech-rich option with multiple powertrain choices (including electric), while the Elroq prioritizes …
Toyota bZ4X
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Toyota bZ4X stakes its claim as a sensible, go-anywhere electric with Toyota toughness and straightforward tech, while the Skoda Elroq answers with clever packaging, sharper styling and a dose of European practicality. In this short showdown we’ll cut through badges and specs to tell you which …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Cupra Tavascan and the Skoda Elroq is mostly a question of whether you want a sportier, design-led electric SUV or a more practical, value-focused one. This comparison cuts through the marketing to focus on driving dynamics, range, interior space, technology and running costs …
Kia EV3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Here’s a concise comparison of the Kia EV3 and the Skoda Elroq — two compact electric crossovers that prioritize practicality but take different approaches: the Kia emphasizes modern EV tech and value, while the Skoda focuses on refined packaging and everyday comfort. I’ll compare range, interior …
BYD Tang
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption
Price
64,300 £
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
530 km
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,630 kg
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
Trunk capacity
235 L
Trunk capacity
470 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,955 mm
Width
1,884 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
575 kg
Payload
482 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
517 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
680 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
380 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BYD
Brand
Skoda
Is the BYD Tang offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.