VS

Citroen Berlingo Transporter vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (22,700 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Berlingo Transporter or Nissan Juke?

Citroen Berlingo Transporter vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Nissan Juke

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Berlingo Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Juke is very slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Citroen Berlingo Transporter costs 22,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,361 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Citroen Berlingo Transporter with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Juke offers very slightly more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen Berlingo Transporter delivers markedly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is marginally lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,329 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter offers considerably more boot space – 1,800 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 1,378 L.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter carries considerably more – 991 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 564 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen Berlingo Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,700
Berlingo Transporter

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 6.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 354 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Nissan Juke
VW Taigo
VS
The Nissan Juke and the VW Taigo pit two small crossovers against each other — one with bold, quirky character and lively handling, the other with understated styling and a more conventional, roomy interior. This quick comparison will help you decide whether you value personality and agility (Juke) …
Citroen Berlingo Transporter
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

The Citroën Berlingo is a no-nonsense work van that pairs cavernous practicality with a surprisingly comfy, car-like driving experience. It won’t pretend to be sporty, but it will swallow your cargo, simplify your day, and keep ownership headaches to a minimum with sensible packaging and clever storage.

details
serpimg_U76QhZ

Reviews Citroen Berlingo Transporter

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
Mme malvoisin roberte
10 Jul 2026, 17:22:24

Very good handling even when loaded, very good fuel consumption, very easy to handle, comfortable seat.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
Michel
10 Sept 2026, 20:47:11

Nice car, Kuga from 2020, without too many bells and whistles. Average consumption 1:19, with two-thirds of the trips between 7 and 15 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Focus
Nissan Juke
VS
The Ford Focus and the Nissan Juke take very different approaches to the compact segment: the Focus focuses on balanced driving dynamics, practicality and refined handling, while the Juke trades conventional packaging for bold styling, higher ride height and city-friendly presence. Choose the Focus …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
Dacia Sandero
Nissan Juke
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Nissan Juke both aim at buyers wanting compact, city-friendly cars, but they take very different approaches: the Sandero focuses on affordability and practical simplicity, while the Juke leans into distinctive styling and a more dynamic feel. This comparison will help you …
Kia Stonic
Nissan Juke
VS
Kia Stonic and Nissan Juke go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Nissan Juke
Opel Frontera
VS
Unsure whether the Nissan Juke or the Opel Frontera is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Citroen Berlingo Transporter
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,700 - 33,800 £
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
354 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 143 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,329 - 1,813 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
1,800 L
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
611 - 991 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Nissan
What drive types are available for the Citroen Berlingo Transporter?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.