Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Citroen C3 Aircross vs Mazda CX-80 comparison
Compare performance (145 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (16,400 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 Aircross or Mazda CX-80?
C3 Aircross
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Citroen C3 Aircross is substantially cheaper – starting at 16,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,880 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Citroen C3 Aircross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Citroen C3 Aircross offers substantially more range – reaching up to 400 km, about 340 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
CX-80
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 182 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Citroen C3 Aircross takes 12.3 s. That’s about 5.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers significantly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm more.
C3 Aircross
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 Aircross is considerably lighter – 1,312 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 819 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Citroen C3 Aircross offers clearly more boot space – 460 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 202 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 462 kg. That’s a difference of about 188 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Citroen C3 Aircross shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £16,400
Citroen C3 Aircross
Citroen C3 Aircross
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Citroen C3 Aircross
The Citroën C3 Aircross is a compact crossover that stands out with its quirky, friendly styling and a tall, airy cabin that prioritizes comfort. It suits buyers who value flexible interior space, good visibility and easy urban driving over sporty performance.
details
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Citroen C3 Aircross
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
16,400 - 29,000 £
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 18.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
307 - 400 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 134 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,312 - 1,608 kg
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
460 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
407 - 462 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 145 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 13 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
74 - 107 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.