Compare performance (145 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (16,400 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 Aircross or VW T-Roc?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the fiercely competitive compact SUV market, two prominent players have emerged as frontrunners: the Citroen C3 Aircross and the VW T-Roc. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, performance, and practicality, but which one edges out as the better choice? We dive deep into their technical aspects and innovations to help you decide.
The Citroen C3 Aircross stands out with its distinctive, upbeat design language. At a length of 4395 mm, width of 1795 mm, and a height of 1660 mm, it commands presence while ensuring ample interior space. On the other hand, the VW T-Roc offers a slightly more traditional SUV look with modern accents. Its dimensions vary slightly, with a length ranging from 4236 mm to 4271 mm and a slightly wider stance, adding a subtle edge in road presence and interior roominess.
The C3 Aircross provides versatility in its engine offerings with petrol, mild hybrids, and fully electric variants. The petrol models deliver between 101 and 136 HP with a manual or automatic dual-clutch transmission, ensuring efficient performance with consumption figures around 5.5 to 6.2 L/100km. Its electric variant offers an impressive range of up to 306 km, catering to the environmentally conscious driver.
The VW T-Roc offers a more diverse power spectrum in its line-up, from modest 115 HP engines to a thrilling 300 HP option for performance enthusiasts. Both petrol and diesel engines are available, with fuel consumption starting at 4.9 L/100km. The T-Roc can be equipped with either front-wheel or all-wheel drive, depending on the engine choice, offering greater flexibility for varying driving conditions.
Inside, the Citroen C3 Aircross boasts a spacious layout with a 5-seat configuration and a generous trunk capacity of 460 L, making it suitable for family trips and long journeys. The VW T-Roc also accommodates up to five passengers, though the trunk space maxes out at 445 L in its most spacious variant, slightly lagging behind the C3 Aircross.
Both SUVs come equipped with cutting-edge technology and features. The Citroen C3 Aircross shines with its advanced driver assistance systems and connectivity options, creating a user-friendly driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a slick infotainment system coupled with a host of digital tools to enhance driving safety and convenience.
The Citroen C3 Aircross offers commendable efficiency with its electric models achieving zero emissions and impressive consumption figures for its petrol variants. The T-Roc, though packed with powerful engine choices, maintains commendable efficiency, particularly its diesel engines, with CO2 emissions starting from 125 g/km.
The choice between the Citroen C3 Aircross and VW T-Roc ultimately depends on your priorities. The C3 Aircross appeals to those looking for innovative features, greener options, and cargo space. Conversely, the T-Roc might attract those desiring a wider range of power options, traditional handling, and all-wheel drive capabilities. Both SUVs bring a lot to the table, making this competition not just about performance, but also about which one aligns best with your lifestyle needs.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Citroen C3 Aircross is substantially cheaper – starting at 16,400 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,990 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C3 Aircross uses 5.3 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Roc offers barely more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Roc is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Citroen C3 Aircross takes 12.3 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Roc delivers marginally more torque with 250 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 Aircross is a bit lighter – 1,312 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 153 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW T-Roc offers barely more boot space – 475 L compared to 460 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries a bit more – 515 kg compared to 462 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.
The Citroen C3 Aircross is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Citroën C3 Aircross is a compact crossover that stands out with its quirky, friendly styling and a tall, airy cabin that prioritizes comfort. It suits buyers who value flexible interior space, good visibility and easy urban driving over sporty performance.
details
The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
16,400 - 29,000 £
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 18.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
307 - 400 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 134 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,312 - 1,608 kg
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
460 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
407 - 462 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 145 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 13 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 107 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España