VS

Citroen C3 vs Ford Ranger comparison

Compare performance (113 HP vs 292 HP), boot space and price (13,700 £ vs 45,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Ford Ranger?

Citroen C3 vs Ford Ranger: Key differences

Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly lighter

Ford Ranger

  • substantially more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Citroen C3 is clearly cheaper – starting at 13,700 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 45,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,878 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Citroen C3 with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Citroen C3 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 325 km, about 283 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Ranger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers substantially more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 179 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.9 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Ford Ranger is visibly faster – reaching 190 km/h, while the Citroen C3 tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 58 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers substantially more torque with 697 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 492 Nm more.

C3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 is clearly lighter – 1,226 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,179 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries considerably more – 989 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 566 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen C3 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £13,700
C3

Citroen C3

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 101 - 113 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 212 - 325 km
Citroen C3
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen C3

The Citroën C3 is a cheeky little city car that turns heads with its bold, quirky styling and a surprisingly comfy, well-thought-out interior. It’s an ideal companion for urban life — easy to park, friendly to drive and built to make everyday trips feel a bit more fun without breaking the bank.

details

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
Citroen C3
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption

Price
13,700 - 24,600 £
Price
45,600 - 71,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
Electric Range
42 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
11.8 kWh
co2
0 - 126 g/km
co2
70 - 315 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
80 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Trunk capacity
310 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,015 mm
Length
5,370 - 5,381 mm
Width
1,755 mm
Width
1,918 - 1,968 mm
Height
1,567 mm
Height
1,884 - 1,922 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,220 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
227 - 423 kg
Payload
676 - 989 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
Power HP
210 - 292 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
132 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
Torque
491 - 697 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
Power kW
154 - 215 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,993 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.