What drive types are available for the Citroen C3?

The Citroen C3 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Citroen C3's engine?

Up to 113 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Citroen C3 according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5 L.

How much electricity does the Citroen C3 use per 100 km?

Average electricity consumption is 16.60 kWh.

What is the electric driving range of the Citroen C3?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 324 km.

What maximum speed does the Citroen C3 reach?

The Citroen C3 reaches up to 183 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Citroen C3?

The Citroen C3 measures 4015 mm long, 1755 mm wide and 1567 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Skoda Kamiq?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Skoda Kamiq deliver on the road?

Up to 150 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kamiq according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.30 L.

What maximum speed does the Skoda Kamiq reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 216 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Skoda Kamiq?

Length 4241 mm, width 1793 mm, height 1562 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kamiq.

Citroen C3 vs Skoda Kamiq – Which model proves itself in everyday driving? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C3 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Citroen C3 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 13700 £, while the Skoda Kamiq costs 21700 £. That’s a price difference of around 8006 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Citroen C3 manages with 5 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq has a noticeable edge – offering 150 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.90 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs somewhat better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Citroen C3 tops out at 183 km/h. The difference is around 33 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kamiq pulls somewhat stronger with 250 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm difference.

C3 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Citroen C3 is barely noticeable lighter – 1226 kg compared to 1231 kg. The difference is around 5 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers evident more room – 400 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 90 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq performs a bit better – up to 1395 L, which is about 175 L more than the Citroen C3.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq clearly perceptible takes the win – 539 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 116 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kamiq shows itself to be offers a more balanced package and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Citroen C3

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

5 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW Taigo

VS

In the compact crossover ring the Skoda Kamiq plays the sensible everyman—generous boot, clever storage and frugal engines—while the VW Taigo strikes a pose with coupe‑like styling and a slightly livelier, more characterful drive. If you need practical space and everyday value, pick the Kamiq; if …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Scala

VS

The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …

Costs and Consumption
Price 13700 - 23800 £	Price 21700 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km 5 - 5.6 L	Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.2 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 206 - 324 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 - 126 g/km	co2 121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 44 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 2 - 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1226 - 1518 kg	Curb weight 1231 - 1340 kg
Trunk capacity 310 L	Trunk capacity 400 L
Length 4015 mm	Length 4241 mm
Width 1755 mm	Width 1793 mm
Height 1567 mm	Height 1562 mm
Max trunk capacity 1220 L	Max trunk capacity 1395 L
Payload 227 - 423 kg	Payload 439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Electric, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 101 - 113 HP	Power HP 95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 9.9 - 12 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed 125 - 183 km/h	Max Speed 183 - 216 km/h
Torque 120 - 205 Nm	Torque 175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 74 - 83 kW	Power kW 70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 1199 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3