Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Citroen C5 X vs Renault Arkana comparison
Compare performance (145 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (36,900 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C5 X or Renault Arkana?
Citroen C5 X vs Renault Arkana: Key differences
Renault Arkana
4 (7 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
C5 X
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Arkana is noticeably cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Citroen C5 X costs 36,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,451 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Citroen C5 X with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Citroen C5 X offers barely more power – delivering 145 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Citroen C5 X is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 10.4 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen C5 X delivers slightly more torque with 230 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
C5 X
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is very slightly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,591 kg. The difference is around 81 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries somewhat more – 451 kg compared to 399 kg. That’s a difference of about 52 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Arkana holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £28,500
Renault Arkana
Citroen C5 X
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Citroen C5 X
Citroen C5 X combines the poise of a sleek crossover with the practicality of an estate, delivering a calm, comfortable cabin that feels designed for long, relaxed journeys rather than racetrack drama. If you want a car that pampers passengers, swallows everyday luggage and glides over rough roads like a diplomat dodging awkward questions, this is your kind of transport.
details
Renault Arkana
The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.
details
Citroen C5 X
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,900 - 39,400 £
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
116 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
52 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,591 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
545 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,805 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,815 mm
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
|
Height
1,485 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,640 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
399 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
211 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.