VS

Peugeot 408 vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (225 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 408 or Renault Arkana?

Peugeot 408 vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • only slightly lighter
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

408

Peugeot 408 vs Renault Arkana: A Modern Matchup in the SUV Market

In the bustling world of SUVs, the latest contenders vying for attention are the Peugeot 408 and the Renault Arkana. Both vehicles represent the innovative spirit of their respective brands, offering distinct features and technical capabilities. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which of these stylish SUVs meets your needs the best.

Arkana

Design and Dimensions

The physical presence of a vehicle often sets the tone for first impressions. The Peugeot 408 stands as a sleek entry with its dimensions of 4687 mm in length, 1848 mm in width, and 1478 mm in height. This gives it a broader stature compared to the Renault Arkana, which measures 4568 mm in length, 1821 mm in width, and 1576 mm in height. Both vehicles sport a sporty five-door configuration, emphasizing practicality without compromising on aesthetics.

408

Engine and Performance

The Peugeot 408 offers a versatile engine lineup, available in petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV), plug-in hybrid, and electric configurations. Power output varies between 136 HP and a robust 225 HP, with torque ranging from 230 Nm to 360 Nm, ensuring a responsive drive in different conditions. The Renault Arkana, meanwhile, focuses on a full hybrid and petrol MHEV options, with horsepower ranging from 140 HP to 158 HP and torque between 205 Nm and 270 Nm.

Arkana

Efficiency and Emissions

Both vehicles exhibit commendable efficiency, yet there's a notable distinction in their eco-footprint. The Peugeot 408 impresses with a commendable hybrid consumption rate of 1.5 to 1.4 L/100 km and an electric range stretching up to 453 km. CO2 emissions range from 116 g/km down to zero, depending on the engine choice. The Arkana's consumption is competitively efficient, offering figures from 4.7 to 6 L/100 km, with corresponding CO2 emissions ranging from 106 to 135 g/km.

408

Transmission and Drive

Transmission technology plays a pivotal role in the driving experience. The Peugeot 408 integrates both dual-clutch and automatic gearboxes, tailored to its diverse engine offerings. Renault Arkana similarly provides an automatic gearbox, emphasizing seamless transitions and a smoother drive. Both models are equipped with front-wheel drive, favoring stability and control on the road.

Arkana

Interior and Trunk Capacity

Inside, both vehicles comfortably seat five occupants, ensuring a spacious and comfortable journey. In terms of cargo space, the Peugeot 408 offers a roomy trunk capacity varying between 471 and 536 liters, compared to the Renault Arkana's range of 480 to 513 liters, depending on the configuration. Each SUV's interior layout prioritizes driver and passenger comfort without sacrificing utility.

408

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

The decision between the Peugeot 408 and Renault Arkana ultimately depends on your priorities. The Peugeot 408 is ideal for those keen on advanced hybrid and electric technologies, coupled with a slightly larger physique. On the other hand, the Renault Arkana presents an excellent choice for individuals valuing efficient hybrid performance, balanced with its agile dimensions. Both SUVs underscore innovation and modern design, ensuring that the choice between them reflects personal preference and driving aspirations.

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 3008
Peugeot 408
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the clever compact SUV with a raised stance and family-friendly practicality, while the Peugeot 408 slips into crossover-coupe territory with sleeker lines and a more road-focused ride. Choose the 3008 for sensible versatility and roomy practicality, or the 408 if you crave …
Peugeot 308 SW
Peugeot 408
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact family cars, the Peugeot 308 SW and Peugeot 408 stand out with their unique offerings. While the 308 SW impresses with its practicality and spaciousness, thanks to its estate design, the 408 delivers a more dynamic silhouette combined with a premium interior …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

408

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Arkana is noticeably cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Peugeot 408 costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,660 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 408 uses 2.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 408 offers clearly more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 408 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 408 delivers substantially more torque with 360 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 155 Nm more.

408

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is only slightly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,544 kg. The difference is around 34 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 408 carries only slightly more – 456 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 408 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £35,100
408

Peugeot 408

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 225 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.7 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 79 - 455 km
details
Peugeot 408
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Peugeot 408

The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.

details
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC523
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC516
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC519
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC522
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC032

Reviews Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Klaudia
15 Jan 2026, 19:46:29

This is one of the most beautiful cars of our time, in an era when every brand churns out cookie‑cutter models — as long as they look like an SUV. It's comfortable, incredibly spacious, picks up nicely on the road and always makes a great impression everywhere ;)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana stands out with its sleek coupe-like design, appealing to those who prioritize style alongside functionality. Meanwhile, the Renault Rafale offers a more traditional SUV layout, emphasizing practicality and spaciousness for families and …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the Renault Arkana and the Renault Captur, both models present unique offerings in the compact SUV category. The Arkana stands out with its coupe-inspired design, providing a sportier profile and an engaging driving experience, ideal for those seeking an adventurous edge. In contrast, the …
Citroen C4
Peugeot 408
VS
Citroen C4 and Peugeot 408 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana offers a more stylish coupe-SUV design, appealing to those looking for a distinctive aesthetic without …
Peugeot 408
Peugeot 508
VS
In the realm of Peugeot's versatile lineup, the Peugeot 408 shines with its dynamic and sleek crossover silhouette, appealing to those seeking a blend of practicality and modern design. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 508 asserts itself as the quintessential choice for those prioritizing luxury and driving …
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Renault Arkana present two distinct approaches to style and capability. The Ford Kuga impresses with its versatile engine options and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for family-oriented buyers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Peugeot 408
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
35,100 - 48,000 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
79 - 455 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
58.2 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 114 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,544 - 1,879 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
471 - 536 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,687 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
1,478 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,528 - 1,583 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
371 - 456 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
160 - 233 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Peugeot 408 have?

The Peugeot 408 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.