Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Peugeot 408 vs Renault Arkana - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (225 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (35100 £ vs 28500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 408 or Renault Arkana?
408
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Arkana has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £ , while the Peugeot 408 costs 35100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6660 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 408 manages with 2.70 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 408 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 225 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 408 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 3.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Peugeot 408 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 233 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 61 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot 408 pulls decisively stronger with 360 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 155 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
408
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Arkana is minimal lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1544 kg. The difference is around 34 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Peugeot 408 offers slightly more room – 536 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 56 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot 408 performs evident better – up to 1583 L, which is about 320 L more than the Renault Arkana.
When it comes to payload, Peugeot 408 barely noticeable takes the win – 456 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Peugeot 408 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Peugeot 408
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £35,100
Peugeot 408
Peugeot 408
4.9 (1 Reviews)
The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.
details
Renault Arkana
4 (1 Reviews)
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Peugeot 408
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35100 - 48000 £
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 5.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.80 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
79 - 455 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
58.20 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 114 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1544 - 1879 kg
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
471 - 536 L
|
Trunk capacity
480 L
|
|
Length
4687 mm
|
Length
4568 mm
|
|
Width
1848 mm
|
Width
1821 mm
|
|
Height
1478 mm
|
Height
1576 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1583 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
|
|
Payload
371 - 456 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 233 km/h
|
Max Speed
172 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drivetrain options does the Peugeot 408 have?
The Peugeot 408 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.