@ Kia Corporation
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Kia Niro vs Renault Arkana – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Kia Niro or Renault Arkana?

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Exploring the Waves of Innovation: Kia Niro vs. Renault Arkana

In the realm of compact SUVs, both Kia and Renault are redefining expectations with their models—the Kia Niro and the Renault Arkana. Each vehicle brings unique features and cutting-edge technology to the table, making them both appealing options for modern drivers. In this article, we'll delve into the technical specifications and innovative aspects that set these two contenders apart.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Design and Dimensions

The Kia Niro, with a length of 4420 mm, a width of 1825 mm, and a height of 1545 mm, presents a balanced and compact profile suitable for urban commuting. In contrast, the Renault Arkana offers a slightly larger build, measuring 4568 mm in length, 1821 mm in width, and 1576 mm in height, providing a more spacious interior without sacrificing its sleeker, coupe-like design.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Performance and Power Train

Under the hood, both the Kia Niro and the Renault Arkana offer hybrid variants that cater to environmentally conscious consumers. The Kia Niro presents options between a Full Hybrid and a Plugin Hybrid, with power outputs ranging from 129 to 171 HP, and an impressive electric range of up to 65 km. The torque peaks at 265 Nm, complemented by a smooth dual-clutch automatic transmission.

The Renault Arkana counters with up to 158 HP available in its hybrid and mild hybrid variants, coupled with a torque range of up to 270 Nm. The Arkana’s performance is just as efficient, showcasing a slightly quicker acceleration capability with its fastest time of 9.1 seconds to reach 100 km/h.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Efficiency and Environmental Concerns

Fuel efficiency is a strong suit for both models. The Kia Niro's consumption ranges from 4.4 to an exceptional 0.8 L/100 km for the Plugin Hybrid variant. The Renault Arkana, with a marginally higher consumption of 4.7 to 6 L/100 km, balances performance with emission sensitivity.

In terms of CO2 emissions, the Niro achieves impressive figures of just 19 to 23 g/km for its Plugin Hybrid version, while Arkana maintains a respectable range from 106 to 135 g/km. Both vehicles demonstrate compliance with CO2 efficiency classes, being an eco-efficient choice in the SUV segment.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Interior and Practicality

Inside, the Kia Niro comfortably seats five passengers, offering a trunk capacity of 451 liters, which maximizes utility without compromising rear-seat comfort. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana enhances practicality with a larger trunk capacity, offering between 480 to 513 liters, tailoring to those who require more cargo space.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Safety and Technology

Both the Niro and Arkana are equipped with state-of-the-art safety features and technology to enhance driving experiences and overall vehicle safety. From advanced driver-assistance systems to infotainment features that keep drivers connected, each model incorporates the best of modern automotive innovation.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Conclusion: A Choice Between Innovation and Practicality

Making a choice between the Kia Niro and the Renault Arkana ultimately comes down to personal preference and specific needs. The Niro, with its advanced hybrid technology and commendable electric range, is ideal for those prioritizing eco-friendliness and compact design. On the other hand, the Arkana appeals to buyers who need a slightly larger vehicle with substantial cargo space and efficient performance. Both vehicles stand out in the crowded SUV market by catering to diverse but distinctive customer demands.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Arkana has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £, while the Kia Niro costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 677 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 2.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia Niro has a distinct edge – offering 180 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia Niro is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 9.90 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia Niro performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 13 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia Niro pulls distinct stronger with 265 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Niro is barely noticeable lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 36 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers minimal more room – 480 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia Niro performs somewhat better – up to 1445 L, which is about 182 L more than the Renault Arkana.

When it comes to payload, Kia Niro minimal takes the win – 466 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Kia Niro shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £29,100
Niro @ Kia Corporation

Kia Niro

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 138 - 180 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.4 - 4.9 L
  • Electric Range : 57 - 62 km

Kia Niro

5 (1)
rate

The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.

details

Renault Arkana

4 (1)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
Kia Niro
Renault Arkana
Niro @ Kia Corporation
Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
29100 - 38600 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
53 - 111 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
Trunk capacity
480 L
Length
4420 mm
Length
4568 mm
Width
1825 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
1545 mm
Height
1576 mm
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
Payload
466 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
Max Speed
172 km/h
Torque
265 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Kia
Brand
Renault
Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.