Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Kia Niro vs Renault Arkana - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (180 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 28500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Renault Arkana?
Niro
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Arkana has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 677 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 2.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Kia Niro has a distinct edge – offering 180 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia Niro is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 9.90 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Kia Niro performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 13 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Kia Niro pulls distinct stronger with 265 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Niro
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia Niro is barely noticeable lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 36 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers minimal more room – 480 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Kia Niro performs somewhat better – up to 1445 L, which is about 182 L more than the Renault Arkana.
When it comes to payload, Kia Niro minimal takes the win – 466 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Kia Niro sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Kia Niro
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £29,100
Kia Niro
Kia Niro
5 (1 Reviews)
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
Renault Arkana
4 (1 Reviews)
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Kia Niro
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 38600 £
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
53 - 111 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
|
Trunk capacity
480 L
|
|
Length
4420 mm
|
Length
4568 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1821 mm
|
|
Height
1545 mm
|
Height
1576 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
|
Max Speed
172 km/h
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?
The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.