Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Kia Niro vs Toyota C-HR - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (180 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 29100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Toyota C-HR?
Niro
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Both models are evenly matched in price – each starts at 29100 £ .
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota C-HR manages with 0.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Kia Niro with 2.40 L. The difference is about 1.60 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 68 km, about 6 km more than the Kia Niro.
C-HR
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR has a slightly edge – offering 223 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Kia Niro performs slight better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Niro
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia Niro is hardly perceptible lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1505 kg. The difference is around 31 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Kia Niro offers barely noticeable more room – 451 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Kia Niro performs noticeable better – up to 1445 L, which is about 290 L more than the Toyota C-HR.
When it comes to payload, Kia Niro hardly perceptible takes the win – 466 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Toyota C-HR shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £29,100
Toyota C-HR
Kia Niro
Toyota C-HR
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Kia Niro
5 (1 Reviews)
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
Toyota C-HR
5 (1 Reviews)
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
Kia Niro
Toyota C-HR
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 38600 £
|
Price
29100 - 42800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
53 - 111 g/km
|
co2
17 - 115 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
|
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
4420 mm
|
Length
4362 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1832 mm
|
|
Height
1545 mm
|
Height
1558 - 1564 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1076 - 1155 L
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?
The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.