Kia Niro vs MG ZS - Differences and prices compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Kia Niro?

Up to 138 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What are the consumption figures for the Kia Niro in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.50 L.

Q: How large is the Kia Niro’s battery?

The battery capacity is 1.30 kWh.

Q: What maximum speed does the Kia Niro reach?

The Kia Niro reaches up to 170 km/h.

Q: What are the dimensions of the Kia Niro?

The Kia Niro measures 4420 mm long, 1825 mm wide and 1545 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: How much power does the MG ZS deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the MG ZS delivers up to 197 HP.

Q: How much fuel does the MG ZS use?

On average, the MG ZS consumes 5 L.

Q: What is the top speed of the MG ZS?

Depending on the model, top speed is 168 km/h.

Compare performance (138 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 18000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or MG ZS?

scroll down

Niro

Comparative Insights Into the Kia Niro and MG ZS

In the swiftly evolving world of SUVs, the Kia Niro and MG ZS are two names that emerge prominently for prospective buyers seeking a blend of innovation, functionality, and efficiency. While both models carve their niche within the SUV market, they appeal to slightly different segments depending on consumer priorities like powertrain choice, features, and driving dynamics. This comparison delves into the technical subtleties and innovations distinguishing these two models.

Powertrain and Efficiency: Diverse Options

The Kia Niro makes a compelling choice for those inclined towards hybrid technology. Offered in Full Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid variants, the Niro showcases a versatile 1.6-liter 4-cylinder engine. Ranging from 129 to 171 horsepower and boasting CO2 efficiency classes from B to C, the Niro is an eco-friendly option in the SUV segment. With a combined consumption of 4.4 to 1 L/100km and an electric range of up to 65 km (Plug-in Hybrid), the Niro is designed to excel in urban commuting efficiently.

On the other hand, the MG ZS provides consumers with the choice of pure electric, full hybrid, or petrol engines. With electric ranges extending up to an impressive 440 km and delivering a robust 197 HP in its top trim, the ZS positions itself as an enticing option for those prioritizing eco-conscious efficiency. The electric and hybrid ZS models offer considerable innovation with battery capacities of up to 65.7 kWh and consumption as efficient as 17.3 kWh/100 km.

scroll down

Niro

Performance and Driving Dynamics

The Kia Niro's performance is marked by its reliable front-wheel drive and automatic dual-clutch transmission. Its acceleration from 0-100 km/h ranges between 10.4 to 11.3 seconds depending on the variant, with a max speed around 160 km/h, focusing on a balance between performance and ecology.

In comparison, the MG ZS outshines some competitors with quicker acceleration capabilities, clocking 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.6 seconds. The ZS can push to speeds of 175 km/h, supported by impressive torque figures of 280 Nm, providing a zestier driving experience. Whether opting for electric or combustion options, the ZS blends performance with everyday practicality.

Design and Dimensions

Externally, both vehicles maintain a sleek SUV silhouette. The Kia Niro is marginally smaller in length at 4420 mm, whereas the MG ZS stretches slightly longer with a 4430 mm stature. Yet, the MG ZS’s increased height of 1649 mm provides a more commanding presence on the road compared to the Niro’s height of 1545 mm.

Internally, the vehicles accommodate five seats, blending comfort with ample cargo space. The Kia Niro offers a trunk capacity ranging from 348 to 451 liters, ideal for moderate hauling needs. Meanwhile, the MG ZS offers up to 448 liters, slightly favoring greater storage versatility.

Niro

Technological Advancements and Safety

Both Kia and MG have integrated cutting-edge technology within their SUVs. The Kia Niro stands out with its hybrid technology integration, appealing to tech-savvy consumers interested in cutting-edge automotive applications. In addition, its dual-clutch transmission ensures smooth shifts enhancing driving comfort.

MG ZS technologies emphasize electric innovation, incorporating advanced electric drive systems, enabling longer-range electric travel, crucial in allowing consumers the choice of a lower carbon footprint. Safety is a priority with diverse driver assistance systems improving the driving experience.

Concluding Thoughts

Ultimately, the decision between the Kia Niro and MG ZS largely hinges on the buyer's driving priorities. The Niro caters well to hybrid enthusiasts seeking excellent fuel efficiency and greener commutes. Conversely, the MG ZS attracts attention from those leaning towards electric innovations and superior performance dynamics. With advancements and distinct offerings from both manufacturers, choosing between them depends on aligning consumer needs with the technological benefits each vehicle offers.

Kia Niro

5 (1 Reviews)

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 4.50 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the MG ZS with 5 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 197 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 8.70 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.10 s. That’s about 2.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia Niro performs barely noticeable better – reaching 170 km/h, while the MG ZS tops out at 168 km/h. The difference is around 2 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia Niro pulls convincingly stronger with 265 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm difference.

scroll down

Niro

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG ZS is slightly lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1474 kg. The difference is around 144 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia Niro offers minimal more room – 451 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG ZS performs slight better – up to 1457 L, which is about 12 L more than the Kia Niro.

When it comes to payload, MG ZS barely noticeable takes the win – 470 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Kia Niro

MG ZS

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Price

Consumption L/100km

co2

Fuel tank capacity

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Power HP

Acceleration 0-100km/h

Max Speed

Torque

Number of Cylinders

Power kW

Engine capacity

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Seats

Curb weight

Trunk capacity

Max trunk capacity

Payload

from about £18,000

MG ZS

Price : 18000 - 24000 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail : Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 116 - 197 HP
Consumption L/100km : 5 - 6.5 L
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 8.7 - 12.5 s
Model Year : 2024 - 2025
Max Speed : 168 km/h
Torque : 148 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 4
Doors : 5
Model : ZS
Modell : ZS 1.5 Hybrid+, ZS 1.5
CO2 Efficiency Class : C, E
Trim Level : Automatik, Comfort Automatik, Luxury Automatik, Comfort
Power kW : 85 - 145 kW
co2 : 113 - 145 g/km
Engine capacity : 1495 - 1498 cm3
Curb weight : 1330 - 1420 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 41 L
Trunk capacity : 443 L
Length : 4430 mm
Width : 1818 mm
Height : 1635 mm
Brand : MG
Max trunk capacity : 1457 L
Payload : 375 - 470 kg

details

Kia Niro

5 (1 Reviews)

The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.

details

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)

The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.

details

Top Car Comparisons

MG ZS

Omoda 5

The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …

MG ZS

Toyota Yaris Cross

In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the MG ZS and Toyota Yaris Cross present compelling choices for consumers seeking style and versatility. The MG ZS impresses with its value-for-money proposition, spacious interior, and bold design, while the Toyota Yaris Cross offers a refined driving …

Kia Niro

MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price 29100 - 33800 £	Price 18000 - 24000 £
Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 4.9 L	Consumption L/100km 5 - 6.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 1.30 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 102 - 111 g/km	co2 113 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 L	Fuel tank capacity 41 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1474 kg	Curb weight 1330 - 1420 kg
Trunk capacity 451 L	Trunk capacity 443 L
Length 4420 mm	Length 4430 mm
Width 1825 mm	Width 1818 mm
Height 1545 mm	Height 1635 mm
Max trunk capacity 1445 L	Max trunk capacity 1457 L
Payload 466 kg	Payload 375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid	Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 138 HP	Power HP 116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 11.1 - 11.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed 170 km/h	Max Speed 168 km/h
Torque 265 Nm	Torque 148 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 102 kW	Power kW 85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity 1580 cm3	Engine capacity 1495 - 1498 cm3