@ Kia Corporation
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
VS

Kia Niro vs MG ZS – Differences & prices compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Kia Niro or MG ZS fits your lifestyle better.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Comparative Insights Into the Kia Niro and MG ZS

In the swiftly evolving world of SUVs, the Kia Niro and MG ZS are two names that emerge prominently for prospective buyers seeking a blend of innovation, functionality, and efficiency. While both models carve their niche within the SUV market, they appeal to slightly different segments depending on consumer priorities like powertrain choice, features, and driving dynamics. This comparison delves into the technical subtleties and innovations distinguishing these two models.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Powertrain and Efficiency: Diverse Options

The Kia Niro makes a compelling choice for those inclined towards hybrid technology. Offered in Full Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid variants, the Niro showcases a versatile 1.6-liter 4-cylinder engine. Ranging from 129 to 171 horsepower and boasting CO2 efficiency classes from B to C, the Niro is an eco-friendly option in the SUV segment. With a combined consumption of 4.4 to 1 L/100km and an electric range of up to 65 km (Plug-in Hybrid), the Niro is designed to excel in urban commuting efficiently.

On the other hand, the MG ZS provides consumers with the choice of pure electric, full hybrid, or petrol engines. With electric ranges extending up to an impressive 440 km and delivering a robust 197 HP in its top trim, the ZS positions itself as an enticing option for those prioritizing eco-conscious efficiency. The electric and hybrid ZS models offer considerable innovation with battery capacities of up to 65.7 kWh and consumption as efficient as 17.3 kWh/100 km.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Performance and Driving Dynamics

The Kia Niro's performance is marked by its reliable front-wheel drive and automatic dual-clutch transmission. Its acceleration from 0-100 km/h ranges between 10.4 to 11.3 seconds depending on the variant, with a max speed around 160 km/h, focusing on a balance between performance and ecology.

In comparison, the MG ZS outshines some competitors with quicker acceleration capabilities, clocking 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.6 seconds. The ZS can push to speeds of 175 km/h, supported by impressive torque figures of 280 Nm, providing a zestier driving experience. Whether opting for electric or combustion options, the ZS blends performance with everyday practicality.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Design and Dimensions

Externally, both vehicles maintain a sleek SUV silhouette. The Kia Niro is marginally smaller in length at 4420 mm, whereas the MG ZS stretches slightly longer with a 4430 mm stature. Yet, the MG ZS’s increased height of 1649 mm provides a more commanding presence on the road compared to the Niro’s height of 1545 mm.

Internally, the vehicles accommodate five seats, blending comfort with ample cargo space. The Kia Niro offers a trunk capacity ranging from 348 to 451 liters, ideal for moderate hauling needs. Meanwhile, the MG ZS offers up to 448 liters, slightly favoring greater storage versatility.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Technological Advancements and Safety

Both Kia and MG have integrated cutting-edge technology within their SUVs. The Kia Niro stands out with its hybrid technology integration, appealing to tech-savvy consumers interested in cutting-edge automotive applications. In addition, its dual-clutch transmission ensures smooth shifts enhancing driving comfort.

MG ZS technologies emphasize electric innovation, incorporating advanced electric drive systems, enabling longer-range electric travel, crucial in allowing consumers the choice of a lower carbon footprint. Safety is a priority with diverse driver assistance systems improving the driving experience.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Concluding Thoughts

Ultimately, the decision between the Kia Niro and MG ZS largely hinges on the buyer's driving priorities. The Niro caters well to hybrid enthusiasts seeking excellent fuel efficiency and greener commutes. Conversely, the MG ZS attracts attention from those leaning towards electric innovations and superior performance dynamics. With advancements and distinct offerings from both manufacturers, choosing between them depends on aligning consumer needs with the technological benefits each vehicle offers.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £, while the Kia Niro costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 11143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 2.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5 L. The difference is about 2.60 L per 100 km.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a slight edge – offering 197 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8.70 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia Niro performs barely noticeable better – reaching 185 km/h, while the MG ZS tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia Niro pulls convincingly stronger with 265 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm difference.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG ZS is slightly lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1474 kg. The difference is around 144 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia Niro offers minimal more room – 451 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG ZS performs slight better – up to 1457 L, which is about 12 L more than the Kia Niro.

When it comes to payload, MG ZS barely noticeable takes the win – 470 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Kia Niro proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Kia Niro is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £29,100
Niro @ Kia Corporation

Kia Niro

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 138 - 180 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.4 - 4.9 L
  • Electric Range : 57 - 62 km

Kia Niro

5 (1)
rate

The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.

details

MG ZS

5 (1)
rate

The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.

details
Kia Niro
MG ZS
Niro @ Kia Corporation
ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
29100 - 38600 £
Price
18000 - 24000 £
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5 - 6.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
53 - 111 g/km
co2
113 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
41 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
Curb weight
1330 - 1420 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
Trunk capacity
443 L
Length
4420 mm
Length
4430 mm
Width
1825 mm
Width
1818 mm
Height
1545 mm
Height
1635 mm
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
Max trunk capacity
1457 L
Payload
466 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
Max Speed
168 - 179 km/h
Torque
265 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
Engine capacity
1495 - 1498 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
Brand
Kia
Brand
MG
Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.