Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Ford Transit Transporter - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (180 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (32100 £ vs 39900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Ford Transit Transporter?
Transit Transporter
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Citroen Jumpy Transporter has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 32100 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7803 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Citroen Jumpy Transporter manages with 6.20 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.90 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Transit Transporter: with 21.30 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter with 23.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.30 kWh.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter performs somewhat better – achieving up to 402 km, about 74 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.
Transit Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter has a noticeable edge – offering 269 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 89 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter performs distinct better – reaching 160 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Transit Transporter pulls minimal stronger with 430 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Transit Transporter
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
In curb weight, Citroen Jumpy Transporter is evident lighter – 1722 kg compared to 2074 kg. The difference is around 352 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter performs decisively better – up to 14100 L, which is about 8000 L more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.
When it comes to payload, Ford Transit Transporter significantly takes the win – 2607 kg compared to 1226 kg. That’s a difference of about 1381 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Transit Transporter proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Transit Transporter is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £39,900
Ford Transit Transporter
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Ford Transit Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.
detailsFord Transit Transporter
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
details
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Ford Transit Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32100 - 52000 £
|
Price
39900 - 73000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
|
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 199 g/km
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
69 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1722 - 2188 kg
|
Curb weight
2074 - 2765 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4959 - 5309 mm
|
Length
5531 - 6704 mm
|
|
Width
1920 mm
|
Width
2059 mm
|
|
Height
1895 - 1935 mm
|
Height
2530 - 2778 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3200 - 6100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
9300 - 14100 L
|
|
Payload
881 - 1226 kg
|
Payload
735 - 2607 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
130 - 160 km/h
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1499 - 2184 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1996 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2019 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Ford
|
What drive types are available for the Citroen Jumpy Transporter?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.