Compare performance (180 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (32,100 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Ford Transit Transporter?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Citroen Jumpy Transporter is significantly cheaper – starting at 32,100 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 35,179 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 74 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers markedly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 89 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers only slightly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
The Citroen Jumpy Transporter holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32,100 - 52,000 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 199 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,188 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
881 - 1,226 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Ford
|