Compare performance (269 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 43,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Nissan Primastar Transporter?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan Primastar Transporter is considerably cheaper – starting at 43,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,786 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers noticeably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 99 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers slightly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
The Ford Transit Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Nissan Primastar is a no-nonsense transporter that pairs rugged practicality with a surprisingly civilized cabin, so you arrive with your tools — and your temper — intact. It may not steal glances at the lights, but its sensible layout and dependable nature make it the kind of van you’ll happily rely on day in, day out.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
43,500 - 48,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
178 - 184 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,926 - 2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,956 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
899 - 1,110 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|