@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
VS

Ford Transit Transporter vs Kia PV5 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (269 HP vs 163 HP), boot space and price (39900 £ vs 32800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Kia PV5?

Ford Transit Transporter

Kia PV5

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Transporter @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Kia PV5 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 32800 £, while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39900 £. That’s a price difference of around 7113 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Kia PV5: with 19.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 21.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.50 kWh.

As for range, the Kia PV5 performs evident better – achieving up to 400 km, about 83 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.

Transit Transporter @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter has a evident edge – offering 269 HP compared to 163 HP. That’s roughly 106 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Kia PV5 performs to a small extent better – reaching 135 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Transit Transporter pulls clearly stronger with 430 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 180 Nm difference.

Transit Transporter @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers a bit more seating capacity – 6 vs 5.

In curb weight, Kia PV5 is to a small extent lighter – 1860 kg compared to 2074 kg. The difference is around 214 kg.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter performs convincingly better – up to 14100 L, which is about 9680 L more than the Kia PV5.

When it comes to payload, Ford Transit Transporter clearly takes the win – 2607 kg compared to 790 kg. That’s a difference of about 1817 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Ford Transit Transporter shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £39,900
Transit Transporter @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Transit Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 105 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.9 - 10.3 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.3 - 32 kWh
  • Electric Range : 247 - 317 km
Ford Transit Transporter
Kia PV5

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Transporter

The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.

details

Kia PV5

The Kia EV5 is an exciting new entrant in the landscape of electric SUVs, promising a blend of style and innovation that captures attention. It boasts a sleek and modern design that aligns with Kia's evolving aesthetic identity, blending practicality with eye-catching details. With its foray into the electric vehicle segment, the EV5 is set to offer a highly competitive option for those looking to embrace sustainable mobility without compromising on comfort or tech features.

details
Ford Transit Transporter
Kia PV5
Transit Transporter @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Consumption

Price
39900 - 69100 £
Price
32800 - 38900 £
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
19.8 - 20.3 kWh
Electric Range
247 - 317 km
Electric Range
288 - 400 km
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
Battery Capacity
51.5 - 71.2 kWh
co2
0 - 270 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Cargo Van, Bus
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
4
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
2074 - 2765 kg
Curb weight
1860 - 2145 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
1320 L
Length
5531 - 6704 mm
Length
4695 mm
Width
2059 mm
Width
1850 - 1895 mm
Height
2530 - 2778 mm
Height
1923 mm
Max trunk capacity
9300 - 14100 L
Max trunk capacity
2300 - 4420 L
Payload
735 - 2607 kg
Payload
505 - 790 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
Power HP
121 - 163 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 16.3 s
Max Speed
120 km/h
Max Speed
135 km/h
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
Torque
250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
Power kW
89 - 120 kW
Engine capacity
1996 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2019 - 2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Kia
What drivetrain options does the Ford Transit Transporter have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.