VS

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Volvo EC40 comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (32,100 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Volvo EC40?

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Volvo EC40: Key differences

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

  • substantially cheaper
  • moderately lighter
details

Volvo EC40

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jumpy Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen Jumpy Transporter is substantially cheaper – starting at 32,100 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,404 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EC40 is clearly more efficient: consuming 16.2 kWh/100km compared to 23.6 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumpy Transporter. That’s a difference of about 7.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 257 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.

EC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers significantly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 262 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 7.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers clearly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 270 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen Jumpy Transporter is moderately lighter – 1,722 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 343 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter carries substantially more – 1,226 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 791 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EC40 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,500
EC40

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 486 - 585 km
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.

details

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption

Price
32,100 - 52,000 £
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 199 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,188 kg
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
404 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,873 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
881 - 1,226 kg
Payload
395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.