VS

Citroen Spacetourer vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Spacetourer or Mazda CX-80?

Citroen Spacetourer vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Citroen Spacetourer

  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • barely lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Spacetourer

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Citroen Spacetourer is considerably cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,246 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Citroen Spacetourer with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Citroen Spacetourer offers substantially more range – reaching up to 351 km, about 291 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Citroen Spacetourer takes 11 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers noticeably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Spacetourer

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Citroen Spacetourer offers more seats – 9 vs 7.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen Spacetourer is barely lighter – 1,953 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 178 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen Spacetourer offers clearly more boot space – 2,011 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 1,753 L.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Spacetourer carries noticeably more – 914 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 264 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen Spacetourer holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £35,100
Spacetourer

Citroen Spacetourer

  • Engine Type Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 136 - 180 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 23.7 - 24 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 219 - 351 km
Citroen Spacetourer
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen Spacetourer

The Citroën SpaceTourer is a quietly practical people carrier that turns the chaos of family transport into a calm, sensible experience. With clever interior packaging and a relaxed ride it makes long trips surprisingly pleasant — even the backseat critics might stop grumbling.

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
Citroen Spacetourer
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

Price
35,100 - 44,900 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23.7 - 24 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
219 - 351 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 180 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Bus
Body Type
SUV
Seats
8 - 9
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,953 - 2,211 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
1,624 - 2,011 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
877 - 914 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 180 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
100 - 132 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
2,184 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.