Two cars, one duel: CUPRA Formentor meets Skoda Kamiq.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
In the highly competitive SUV segment, the CUPRA Formentor and Skoda Kamiq are standout options for drivers seeking performance, innovation, and style. Both models echo their brand's commitment to delivering a top-tier driving experience, albeit in different flavors. Let's delve into their specific attributes and see how they stack up against each other.
The CUPRA Formentor is a powerhouse in its own right, boasting a variety of engine choices, including petrol, plug-in hybrid, mild hybrid, and diesel. At the top, it offers a staggering 333 HP with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 4.8 seconds. The available all-wheel-drive combined with a dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures optimum power delivery and handling, perfect for adrenaline-seeking drivers.
In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq offers a more conservative yet practical choice with its petrol engines. The top-end model provides 150 HP, achieving a 0-100 km/h sprint in 8.3 seconds. With front-wheel drive and excellent fuel efficiency, the Kamiq is designed for urban journeys while maintaining efficiency, with a combined consumption of around 5.6 L/100km.
The Formentor introduces cutting-edge technology with its hybrid models enabling an electric-only range of up to 125 km, perfect for short city commutes. The substantial 19.7 kWh battery further emphasizes its innovational edge. Its CO2 efficiency class spans from E to G, reflecting its performance-focused design choices.
Meanwhile, the Kamiq doesn’t shy away from providing tech-savvy features. While it keeps things simple with a pure petrol lineup, efficiency remains its key offering. The Kamiq's CO2 emissions range from 121 to 130 g/km, showcasing a keen focus on minimizing environmental impact without compromising usability.
In terms of dimensions, the Formentor stretches to 4451 mm in length, providing a spacious interior and a competitive trunk capacity starting from 345 L. Its sporty stance, with widths and heights of 1839 mm and up to 1537 mm respectively, gives it an aggressive road presence.
The Kamiq, shorter at 4241 mm, is tailored for those who relish compact SUVs. With a trunk space of 400 L, it offers considerable room for city adventures and weekend getaways. Despite its compact nature, it superbly maximizes internal space for passenger comfort.
The CUPRA Formentor and Skoda Kamiq cater to different aspects of the SUV market. The Formentor appeals to those looking for a blend of exhilarating performance and cutting-edge hybrid technology. Meanwhile, the Kamiq stands as a testament to practicality, fuel efficiency, and adept handling within urban settings. Whether you're drawn to rugged performance or refined efficiency, both models offer compelling choices for the modern driver. Your preference would depend on whether performance or practicality is your priority in an increasingly crowded SUV market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Kamiq has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £, while the CUPRA Formentor costs 35200 £. That’s a price difference of around 13530 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: CUPRA Formentor manages with 1.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.30 L. The difference is about 3.90 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Formentor has a significantly edge – offering 333 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 183 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Formentor is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.80 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.10 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the CUPRA Formentor performs slightly better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Skoda Kamiq tops out at 216 km/h. The difference is around 34 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: CUPRA Formentor pulls clearly stronger with 420 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is slightly lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1434 kg. The difference is around 203 kg.
In terms of boot space, the CUPRA Formentor offers slightly more room – 450 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.
In maximum load capacity, the CUPRA Formentor performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1505 L, which is about 110 L more than the Skoda Kamiq.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq slight takes the win – 539 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.
The CUPRA Formentor proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
CUPRA Formentor is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
With coupe-like lines and a muscular stance the Cupra Formentor blends sporty drama with everyday sense, so it looks like it’s in motion even at a standstill. Inside and out it’s tuned for drivers who want engaging handling and a grown-up cabin — practical enough for daily life, playful enough to make the commute feel like a short track session.
details
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35200 - 55000 £
|
Price
21700 - 31900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 8.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
117 - 126 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
32 - 199 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1434 - 1742 kg
|
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
345 - 450 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
4451 mm
|
Length
4241 mm
|
|
Width
1839 mm
|
Width
1793 mm
|
|
Height
1511 - 1537 mm
|
Height
1562 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1415 - 1505 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 526 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 333 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 - 9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 420 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 245 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, E, D, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España