VS

CUPRA Formentor vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: CUPRA Formentor or Skoda Kodiaq?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Formentor @ seat-mediacenter.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

CUPRA Formentor has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 35200 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 1607 £.

Both cars consume an average of 0.40 L per 100 km – no difference here.

As for range, the CUPRA Formentor performs slight better – achieving up to 126 km, about 3 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq @ skoda-media.de

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Formentor has a noticeable edge – offering 333 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Formentor is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4.80 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the CUPRA Formentor performs slight better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Skoda Kodiaq tops out at 231 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: CUPRA Formentor pulls minimal stronger with 420 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.

Formentor @ seat-mediacenter.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, CUPRA Formentor is somewhat lighter – 1434 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 250 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers decisively more room – 910 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 460 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2105 L, which is about 600 L more than the CUPRA Formentor.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq minimal takes the win – 545 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.

Who wins the race?

The CUPRA Formentor proves to be slightly ahead and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
CUPRA Formentor is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £35,200
CUPRA-Formentor-VZ5_12_HQ

CUPRA Formentor

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 333 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.8 L
  • Electric Range : 117 - 126 km
details

CUPRA Formentor

The CUPRA Formentor captures attention with its striking design and dynamic presence on the road. Inside, it offers a refined interior that harmonises sporty touches with modern technology, creating an engaging driving environment. Its agile handling and performance-oriented features make it a standout choice for those seeking an exhilarating driving experience.

details
CUPRA-Formentor-VZ5_12_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.com
CUPRA-Formentor-VZ5_04_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.com
CUPRA-Formentor-VZ5_09_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.com
CUPRA-Formentor-VZ5_17_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.com
CUPRA-Formentor-VZ5_18_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.com

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_45646 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ skoda-media.de

Similar Comparisons

CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you want maximum space and minimum spend — just don’t expect leather and laser-cut precision.
CUPRA Formentor
Skoda Kodiaq
Formentor
Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
35200 - 55000 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.8 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
117 - 126 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
8 - 199 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1434 - 1742 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
345 - 450 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4451 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1839 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1511 - 1537 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1415 - 1505 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
458 - 526 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 333 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 - 9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
205 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
250 - 420 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 245 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G, E, D, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a boot that could double as a small country.
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and performance-focused features, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a more practical approach, emphasizing spaciousness and versatility without compromising on comfort. While the Terramar exudes a dynamic flair, the Kodiaq remains a solid choice for families needing a reliable and accommodating vehicle.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and driving pep, but the Kodiaq will still win the school run.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a more compact multi-purpose vehicle experience, ideal for urban dwellers. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences for space, style, and driving experience.
Audi A3 Sportback
CUPRA Formentor
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi A3 Sportback and CUPRA Formentor showcase strikingly different approaches to premium compact performance. The A3 Sportback boasts a refined interior and advanced tech features, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a sophisticated driving experience. Meanwhile, the CUPRA Formentor offers a sportier edge with its bold design and dynamic handling, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a more exhilarating ride.
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing to families who prioritize comfort and adaptability. Both models offer distinct strengths, making the choice between them a matter of individual lifestyle needs and preferences.
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a reputation for safety and comfort. Ultimately, the decision between these two distinctive models hinges on personal preferences for driving engagement versus everyday usability.
What drive types are available for the CUPRA Formentor?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.