Compare performance (390 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (35,200 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Formentor or Volvo XC60?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the fiercely competitive compact SUV segment, the 2024 CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC60 emerge as two standout contenders. Both vehicles embody a unique blend of style, performance, and innovation, each catering to distinct customer preferences. In this head-to-head comparison, we delve into the specifics that set these two apart, from engine capabilities to interior comfort.
The CUPRA Formentor is a versatile dynamo with a range of engine options including petrol, plug-in hybrid, petrol MHEV, and diesel. Power outputs vary across the lineup, from 150 HP to a robust 333 HP. This Spanish marvel offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, paired with either a manual or dual-clutch automatic gearbox. For those seeking acceleration thrills, the CUPRA Formentor sprints from 0-100 km/h in as little as 4.8 seconds.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60, representing Swedish precision, features a choice between petrol mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid engines. The power spectrum here extends from 250 HP to an impressive 455 HP. Unlike the Formentor, the XC60 comes exclusively with all-wheel drive and an automatic gearbox, offering a seamless driving experience. The top-performing hybrid variant accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 4.9 seconds, aligning closely with its CUPRA competitor.
When it comes to efficiency, both SUVs boast impressive credentials, particularly in their hybrid iterations. The CUPRA Formentor plug-in hybrid excels with a consumption rate of just 0.4 L/100km and an electric range of up to 125 km, thanks to a 19.7 kWh battery. Meanwhile, the XC60 follows suit with a consumption of 0.9 L/100km and a maximum electric range of 80 km, driven by its 14.7 kWh battery.
In terms of design, the CUPRA Formentor's sporty stance is evident with its compact dimensions: 4451 mm in length, 1839 mm in width, and a height between 1511 mm and 1537 mm. Its bold design language is accentuated by the dynamic lines typical of the CUPRA brand.
The Volvo XC60, marginally larger, measures 4688 mm in length, 1902 mm in width, and 1658 mm in height. It embraces Volvo's elegant yet understated Scandinavian design ethos, offering a more understated but sophisticated appeal.
Both SUVs provide spacious interiors with ample room for five passengers. The CUPRA Formentor's trunk capacity ranges from 345 L to 450 L, depending on the variant, while the Volvo XC60 offers a modestly larger trunk space of 468 L to 483 L. Both models emphasize user comfort, with premium materials and state-of-the-art infotainment systems to enhance the driving experience.
Choosing between the CUPRA Formentor and the Volvo XC60 ultimately comes down to personal preference. The Formentor is ideal for those seeking a spirited driving experience with a sporty flair, while the XC60 leans towards a balanced blend of luxury, efficiency, and safety. Both models exemplify the prowess of modern SUV engineering, making either choice a commendable option for the discerning buyer.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
CUPRA Formentor is substantially cheaper – starting at 35,200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,036 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the CUPRA Formentor uses 1.4 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 1.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the CUPRA Formentor offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 126 km, about 47 km more than the Volvo XC60.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers only slightly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 390 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Formentor is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Volvo XC60 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers clearly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 480 Nm. That’s about 189 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Formentor is clearly lighter – 1,434 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 716 kg.
When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Formentor carries marginally more – 526 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
The CUPRA Formentor is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The CUPRA Formentor blends sporty driving dynamics with crossover practicality, delivering sharp handling and an engaging character that makes it fun on twisty roads as well as in daily driving. Inside, it pairs a driver-focused cabin and premium materials with clever practicality, offering a confident, distinctive alternative to conventional SUVs.
details
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,200 - 62,500 £
|
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
117 - 126 km
|
Electric Range
79 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
32 - 229 g/km
|
co2
59 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,434 - 1,742 kg
|
Curb weight
2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
345 - 450 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,839 - 1,852 mm
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
439 - 526 kg
|
Payload
510 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 390 HP
|
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 480 Nm
|
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 287 kW
|
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, E, D, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España