Compare performance (272 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (41,400 £ vs 36,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Lynk & Co 01?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The SUV market is as competitive as ever, and two contenders are making strong cases for themselves: the CUPRA Terramar and the Lynk & Co 01. Both are vying for the attention of tech-savvy drivers seeking a blend of performance, efficiency, and cutting-edge innovation. While each has its merits, let's see how these models stack up in essential areas.
The CUPRA Terramar is a versatile option with multiple engine configurations, including a plugin hybrid and petrol variants, delivering up to 272 horsepower. Its acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies, with the fastest being an impressive 5.3 seconds. The Terramar provides both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, tailored for diverse driving needs.
Comparatively, Lynk & Co 01 focuses solely on a plugin hybrid setup, offering up to 276 horsepower. It ensures a seamless drive, hitting 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.7 seconds. Unlike the Terramar, 01 sticks to front-wheel drive as its sole drivetrain preference.
Efficiency is where these two shine, with both featuring plugin hybrid capabilities. The CUPRA Terramar offers remarkable consumption rates as low as 0.4 L/100km, with an electric range of 120 km, aided by its 19.7 kWh battery capacity. This model is a formidable choice for eco-conscious drivers.
Meanwhile, the Lynk & Co 01 boasts consumption as low as 0.9 L/100km and an electric range of 75 km from its 14.1 kWh battery. Though slightly less than the Terramar, its performance is still highly commendable, positioning it as an efficient urban cruiser.
In terms of size, the Lynk & Co 01 is slightly longer, measuring up to 4545 mm compared to the Terramar's 4519 mm. The trunk capacity of 466 liters in 01 exceeds the Terramar's 450 liters, which could be a deciding factor for those requiring extra cargo space.
Both models comfortably seat five passengers, ensuring ample room within the cabin. The Terramar's height is slightly lower at 1586 mm compared to the 1694 mm height of Lynk & Co 01, potentially impacting the overall driving feel and handling.
Both the Terramar and 01 present high-end technology offerings. The Terramar, with its broader engine choices, caters to a wider audience, including performance and hybrid seekers. Its plugin hybrid system showcases leading-edge efficiency and emission reduction.
Lynk & Co offers a modernized, user-friendly interior integrated with the latest infotainment systems, catering to digitally inclined users. The emphasis on seamless connectivity and driver assistance systems makes it an attractive option for tech enthusiasts.
The CUPRA Terramar and Lynk & Co 01 each bring unique strengths to the table. The Terramar impresses with its performance flexibility and extended electric range, making it suitable for both urban and spirited driving. In contrast, the Lynk & Co 01's streamlined hybrid approach and tech-forward interior provide an intuitive driving experience.
Ultimately, the choice between these innovative SUVs will hinge on individual priorities: whether it's the Terramar's dynamic options and longer electric range or the Lynk & Co 01's efficient, tech-savvy urban focus.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Lynk & Co 01 is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,900 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 41,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,565 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lynk & Co 01 uses 0.9 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the CUPRA Terramar with 1.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the CUPRA Terramar offers markedly more range – reaching up to 118 km, about 43 km more than the Lynk & Co 01.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 offers marginally more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Terramar is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Lynk & Co 01 takes 7.7 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Lynk & Co 01 delivers clearly more torque with 535 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is moderately lighter – 1,638 kg compared to 1,935 kg. The difference is around 297 kg.
Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Terramar offers somewhat more boot space – 540 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 74 L.
When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries markedly more – 542 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 127 kg.
The Lynk & Co 01 stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The CUPRA Terramar blends the brand’s sporty DNA with the practicality of a compact crossover, offering striking design and a driver-focused, premium-feeling cabin. It’s aimed at buyers who want engaging handling and athletic looks without giving up everyday usability and modern connectivity.
details
The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,400 - 50,600 £
|
Price
36,900 - 40,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
36 - 191 g/km
|
co2
20 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
|
Curb weight
1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,869 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
512 - 542 kg
|
Payload
415 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
280 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
535 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
206 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España