Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
CUPRA Terramar vs Skoda Octavia Combi – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Two cars, one duel: CUPRA Terramar meets Skoda Octavia Combi.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Terramar
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Octavia Combi has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24400 £, while the CUPRA Terramar costs 36900 £. That’s a price difference of around 12454 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Octavia Combi manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the CUPRA Terramar with 6.10 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.
Octavia Combi
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
Both models deliver identical power – 265 HP each.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Terramar is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the Skoda Octavia Combi takes 6.50 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs minimal better – reaching 250 km/h, while the CUPRA Terramar tops out at 243 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: CUPRA Terramar pulls slight stronger with 400 Nm compared to 370 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Terramar
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is a bit lighter – 1366 kg compared to 1638 kg. The difference is around 272 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers to a small extent more room – 640 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 100 L.
When it comes to payload, CUPRA Terramar minimal takes the win – 542 kg compared to 534 kg. That’s a difference of about 8 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Skoda Octavia Combi proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Octavia Combi is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £24,400
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Octavia Combi
CUPRA Terramar
The CUPRA Terramar is a sharply styled, sporty SUV that brings athletic handling and bold design to buyers who want performance with everyday usability. Inside, premium finishes meet driver-focused flair and family-friendly practicality, making it a tempting pick for anyone who wants thrills without turning their daily routine into a chore.
details
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is the sensible family wagon that somehow turns grocery runs and long trips into a pleasant, unshowy experience — spacious, practical and built like it prefers reliability over flash. With smart touches, clever storage and a cabin that feels grown-up rather than frugal, it’s an easy recommendation for buyers who want maximum utility without sacrificing comfort or style.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Octavia Combi
|
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36900 - 48500 £
|
Price
24400 - 42300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.1 - 8.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
139 - 191 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1638 - 1750 kg
|
Curb weight
1366 - 1553 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
540 L
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
4519 mm
|
Length
4698 - 4709 mm
|
|
Width
1869 mm
|
Width
1829 mm
|
|
Height
1586 mm
|
Height
1455 - 1468 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1700 L
|
|
Payload
540 - 542 kg
|
Payload
471 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 243 km/h
|
Max Speed
203 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drivetrain options does the CUPRA Terramar have?
The CUPRA Terramar is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.