VS

Dacia Jogger vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Jogger or Suzuki Swace?

Dacia Jogger vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Dacia Jogger

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jogger

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Dacia Jogger is substantially cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,457 £.

Both cars consume an average of 4.5 L/100km – no difference here.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Dacia Jogger offers somewhat more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Dacia Jogger is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

Jogger

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Dacia Jogger offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Dacia Jogger is a bit lighter – 1,268 kg compared to 1,475 kg. The difference is around 207 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Dacia Jogger offers very slightly more boot space – 607 L compared to 596 L. That’s a difference of about 11 L.

When it comes to payload, the Dacia Jogger carries visibly more – 559 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 199 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Dacia Jogger is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £15,400
Jogger

Dacia Jogger

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, LPG
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 7.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Jogger and the Dacia Bigster comes down to whether you prioritize flexible seven-seat family practicality and low running costs (the Jogger) or the larger, SUV-styled presence and greater cargo space of the Bigster. I’ll outline their strengths and trade-offs so you can …
Dacia Duster
Dacia Jogger
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Dacia Jogger comes down to whether you want a compact SUV with stronger on-road and light off-road ability or a stretched estate focused on space and family practicality. The Duster favours higher ground clearance and a tougher presence, while the Jogger …
Dacia Jogger
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Dacia Jogger

The Dacia Jogger is a no-nonsense family mover that stretches the idea of value with cavernous practicality and flexible space, perfect for buyers who need a sensible, everyday Swiss Army knife on wheels. It doesn’t try to be glamorous — instead it wins hearts with cheerful thrift, durable materials and honest engineering, giving you useful transport without the pretence.

details
d220423p
d220425p
d230002p
d220421p

Reviews Dacia Jogger

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
Martin
14 Jul 2026, 15:23:21

Anyone who wants lots and lots of space and good equipment (Extreme), combined with comfortable and outstanding fuel consumption (Hybrid 155), as well as good driving performance, is very well served by the Jogger. No more of that rattly cheap heap! It's affordable and in this package unrivaled. They've got it figured out!!!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dave
17 Apr 2026, 11:09:33

the Jogger is spacious and the lack of unnecessary frills and over complex electronics negates frustration and niggles. Practically, it's versatility is great, and the price is unbelievable value.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
FF
3 Feb 2026, 16:18:17

The RAV4's boot is tiny. Pick the Jogger without hesitation — and pay €250 less per month.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Dacia Jogger
Peugeot 5008
VS
Comparing the Dacia Jogger and the Peugeot 5008 pits a no-nonsense, ultra-practical family car against a more polished, comfortably equipped seven-seater. If your priorities are low cost and flexible space the Jogger excels; if you want refinement, tech and a more premium cabin the 5008 is the …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Citroen Berlingo
Dacia Jogger
VS
Choosing between the Citroën Berlingo and the Dacia Jogger comes down to whether you prioritise van-like practicality and clever load solutions or a budget-friendly, car-like seven-seater for family use. The Berlingo excels with a tall, modular cabin and abundant storage, while the Jogger offers …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are closely related compact estate cars that combine hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly space. This comparison focuses on how the Swace and the Corolla Touring Sports differ in styling, equipment, driving feel and running costs …
Dacia Jogger
MG MGS9
VS
Dacia Jogger and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Dacia Jogger or the MG MGS9 …
Dacia Jogger
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
In the battle of practicality and style, the Dacia Jogger emerges as a versatile family-friendly option, boasting ample interior space and an attractive price point. Conversely, the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports offers a more refined driving experience, with its hybrid technology and premium …
Dacia Jogger
VW Caddy
VS
The Dacia Jogger and the VW Caddy offer practical, spacious transport for families and small businesses, but they take very different approaches: the Jogger is a budget-focused, flexible seven-seater while the Caddy is a van-derived compact MPV with stronger build quality and load-carrying ability. …
Dacia Jogger
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Dacia Jogger and Nissan X-Trail go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Dacia Jogger or the …
Dacia Jogger
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
15,400 - 23,500 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
103 - 138 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
MPV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,268 - 1,463 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
160 - 607 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
384 - 559 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, LPG
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 - 158 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
81 - 116 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Dacia
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Dacia Jogger have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.