VS

Dacia Spring vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (102 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (14,500 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Spring or Mazda CX-60?

Dacia Spring vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Dacia Spring

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • considerably lighter
details

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (12 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Spring

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Dacia Spring is significantly cheaper – starting at 14,500 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,186 £.

As for electric range, the Dacia Spring offers clearly more range – reaching up to 225 km, about 162 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 102 HP. That’s roughly 225 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Dacia Spring takes 9.6 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 137 Nm. That’s about 413 Nm more.

Spring

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-60 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Dacia Spring is considerably lighter – 1,070 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 820 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers significantly more boot space – 570 L compared to 308 L. That’s a difference of about 262 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries considerably more – 612 kg compared to 274 kg. That’s a difference of about 338 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Dacia Spring comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £14,500
Spring

Dacia Spring

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 70 - 102 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 221 - 225 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
Dacia Spring
Renault Twingo
VS
Small, affordable and built for city life, the Dacia Spring and Renault Twingo offer two different takes on electric urban transport. This comparison cuts through the specs to show how they differ in range, interior space, driving character and ownership costs so you can choose the better fit.
Dacia Spring
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Dacia Spring

The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.

details
d220192p
d220193p
d220194p

Reviews Dacia Spring

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Rolf
9 Sept 2026, 21:00:49

Very good vehicle for short trips with low fuel consumption.
Simple and straightforward.
Not suitable for long-distance driving.
Fulfills its purpose.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jacek
24 Jan 2026, 15:07:05

A very nimble, clever and fun little car for everyday city driving. It will literally go anywhere. Very cheap to run — it uses on average energy costing 10 zł per 100 km. The equipment includes almost everything you need (heated mirrors are missing in every trim level).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cristian
12 Jan 2026, 12:27:33

Best car for value

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (12 Reviews)
rate
dominique
6 Sept 2026, 12:48:31

Beautiful, spacious car and can handle anything. Drives wonderfully, like it's on rails.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nikola
4 Aug 2026, 09:35:09

The car is simply fantastic. The torque is unbelievable. Acceleration is mesmerizing for an SUV. The interior has a premium feel. The only thing that would make it better is a longer EV range. Otherwise, perfect.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Lexus NX and Mazda CX-60 are two premium SUVs that aim at buyers who want upscale style and modern tech, but they take very different approaches to comfort, driving feel and value. The NX leans toward refined ride quality, high-end materials and hybrid efficiency, while the CX-60 offers a …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Dacia Spring
MG MG4 Urban
VS
Dacia Spring and MG MG4 Urban go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Kia Sportage
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Kia Sportage and Mazda CX-60 target buyers who want a modern SUV but take very different approaches: the Sportage focuses on value, roomy practicality and a long equipment list, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium cabin, sharper driving dynamics and more sophisticated powertrains. If you …
Mazda CX-60
VW Tiguan
VS
Mazda CX-60 and VW Tiguan go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Dacia Spring
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
14,500 - 16,900 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
221 - 225 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,070 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
308 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,583 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
274 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
70 - 102 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
137 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
52 - 75 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Dacia
Brand
Mazda
Is the Dacia Spring offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.