Compare performance (180 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (30,900 £ vs 25,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Scudo or VW Caddy Compact Van?
In the world of compact cargo vans, the Fiat Scudo and Volkswagen's Caddy Kompaktvan emerge as two leading contenders. Both models flaunt an impressive balance of innovation, performance, and utility. Here's a detailed comparison to help you discern which van stands out where it matters most.
The Fiat Scudo offers a diverse engine lineup, including diesel and electric variants. With power outputs ranging between 101 and 180 HP for diesel, and up to 177 HP for electric motors, the Scudo caters to both traditionalists and those leaning toward green technology. These engines are matched with either a manual or an automatic gearbox, prioritizing versatility and control.
In comparison, the VW Caddy Kompaktvan takes a slightly different approach, featuring petrol, diesel, and plug-in hybrid options. Power outputs range from 102 to 150 HP. The VW offers both manual and advanced dual-clutch automatic transmissions, ensuring smooth transitions and enhanced driving pleasure.
Fuel efficiency is a notable strength for VW, with the Caddy Kompaktvan achieving consumption figures as low as 5.3 L/100km for its petrol and diesel models, and a mere 0.5 L/100km for its hybrid version. Scudo's diesel consumption varies between 6.5 and 7.8 L/100km, with electric consumption fluctuating between 23.6 and 27 kWh/100km, offering an electric range of up to 352 km.
Dimension-wise, the Scudo stretches from 4,609 mm to 5,309 mm in length, providing ample space for toolkit and goods. Its payload capacity tops at 1,333 kg, furthered by a robust build with curb weights between 1,616 kg and 2,260 kg.
The Caddy Kompaktvan is slightly more compact, ranging from 4,500 mm to 4,853 mm in length. It offers a maximum payload of 759 kg and curb weights from 1,442 kg to 1,818 kg, making it an agile and maneuverable choice ideal for urban deliveries.
Fiat's Scudo offers various seating configurations, accommodating between 2 to 6 seats, depending on specific model setups. This flexibility can appeal to both cargo transport and team travel needs.
Conversely, the Caddy Kompaktvan maintains a straightforward approach with a 2-seater configuration, focused on maximizing cargo space rather than passenger transport.
The Scudo's embrace of electric powertrains signals Fiat's commitment to innovation and sustainability, while its versatile transmission options address diverse driving preferences. Additionally, the inclusion of a maximum speed of up to 185 km/h demonstrates an ability to swiftly handle longer hauls.
Volkswagen responds with the Caddy Kompaktvan's advanced dual-clutch automatic setup, promising enhanced driving dynamics and a finely tuned experience. The inclusion of plug-in hybrid technology not only offers superior fuel efficiency but also reduces the vehicle's environmental footprint.
Both the Fiat Scudo and the VW Caddy Kompaktvan present compelling features tailored to specific needs. The Scudo’s flexibility and electric range make it appealing for businesses focused on versatile operations and sustainability. Meanwhile, the Caddy's fuel efficiency and innovative transmission solutions provide a fine balance between performance and economy. Thus, your ultimate choice hinges on personal priorities, be it capacity, fuel preference, or tech advancements.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW Caddy Compact Van is somewhat cheaper – starting at 25,800 £ , while the Fiat Scudo costs 30,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,085 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Caddy Compact Van uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Fiat Scudo with 6.2 L/100km. The difference is about 5.7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Fiat Scudo offers clearly more range – reaching up to 352 km, about 232 km more than the VW Caddy Compact Van.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Fiat Scudo offers a bit more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Fiat Scudo delivers slightly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Fiat Scudo offers more seats – 6 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, VW Caddy Compact Van is somewhat lighter – 1,442 kg compared to 1,722 kg. The difference is around 280 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Fiat Scudo carries considerably more – 1,805 kg compared to 759 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,046 kg.
The VW Caddy Compact Van is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Fiat Scudo is a practical and unpretentious van that balances hardworking utility with a surprisingly polished cabin, making it a sensible choice for tradespeople and families who need space without fuss. It doesn't pretend to be flashy, but its clever packaging, sensible driving manners and affordable running costs make the Scudo a dependable partner for the daily grind and weekend projects — and it even manages to look tidy in the car park.
details
The VW Caddy is a clever compact van that turns urban chores into something almost enjoyable, thanks to smart packaging and a cabin that refuses to feel like punishment. For buyers who want useful practicality without drama, the Caddy is a tidy, dependable choice that quietly gets the job done while remaining surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,900 - 51,300 £
|
Price
25,800 - 42,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
221 - 352 km
|
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 172 g/km
|
co2
11 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 6
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,260 kg
|
Curb weight
1,442 - 1,818 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
|
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,819 - 1,823 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 3,700 L
|
|
Payload
840 - 1,805 kg
|
Payload
628 - 759 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 11.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Fiat
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España