VS

Ford Bronco vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (335 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (58,200 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Mazda CX-5?

Ford Bronco vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Ford Bronco

  • considerably more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bronco

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-5 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,251 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-5 uses 7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.3 L/100km. The difference is about 4.3 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco offers considerably more power – delivering 335 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 194 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Bronco is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco delivers clearly more torque with 563 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 325 Nm more.

Bronco

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is clearly lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,289 kg. The difference is around 660 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers only slightly more boot space – 583 L compared to 562 L. That’s a difference of about 21 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries markedly more – 601 kg compared to 411 kg. That’s a difference of about 190 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-5 has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
CX-5

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7 - 7.4 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Ford Bronco
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.

details
FordBronco_CGrey_Dynamic_5-LOW
FordBronco_HPRed_Static_V9-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS_03-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS_04-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS__INTERIOR_28-LOW

Reviews Ford Bronco

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more spirited experience behind the wheel. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 charms with its robust safety features and Scandinavian-inspired interior, prioritizing comfort and …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Austral
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 continues to stand out with its sleek design, upscale interior, and refined driving dynamics. In contrast, the Renault Austral brings a fresh approach with its modern tech offerings and distinctive European flair, making it a formidable …
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its bold design and dynamic performance, appealing to driving enthusiasts who crave a sportier feel. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-5 offers a more refined ride with its upscale interior and focus on comfort, making …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the showdown between the Honda HR-V and the Mazda CX-5, the HR-V impresses with its spacious interior and exceptional fuel efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers and small families. Meanwhile, the CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and robust performance, offering a more …
Ford Bronco
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
257 - 288 g/km
co2
157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Length
-
Length
4,690 mm
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
1,695 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Payload
387 - 411 kg
Payload
601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
563 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
246 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
Is the Ford Bronco offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Bronco is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.