VS

Ford Kuga vs GWM ORA 03 comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 171 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or GWM ORA 03?

Ford Kuga vs GWM ORA 03: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

GWM ORA 03

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

GWM ORA 03 is marginally cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 822 £.

As for electric range, the GWM ORA 03 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 352 km more than the Ford Kuga.

ORA 03

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers visibly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 171 HP. That’s roughly 72 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the GWM ORA 03 takes 8.2 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM ORA 03 delivers only slightly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is very slightly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,615 kg. The difference is around 89 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries visibly more – 550 kg compared to 355 kg. That’s a difference of about 195 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The GWM ORA 03 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,400
ORA 03

GWM ORA 03

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 171 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 310 - 420 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
CUPRA Formentor
Ford Kuga
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the Ford Kuga are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Formentor prioritises sporty driving dynamics and striking design, while the Kuga focuses on comfort, practicality and efficient powertrains. This comparison will cover performance, interior …
Ford Kuga
GWM ORA 03

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details
2025_FORD_KUGA_BLACK_PACKAGE_01-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_11-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_09-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_04

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
Marek
15 Jun 2026, 07:10:36

A very sensible car — I like how it looks, it’s well put together, economical on fuel, the interior is comfortable and fairly traditional without any gimmicks, excellent handling, the performance is really good despite it being a large and heavy car; the trunk could be a bit bigger, but it’s still fine — roomy and generally sufficient for family trips, and above all, so far the car has been reliable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

GWM ORA 03

The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.

details
serpimg_viy3F5

Reviews GWM ORA 03

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Ford Explorer EV
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Ford Explorer EV means deciding whether you want a compact, efficient SUV with petrol/hybrid options or a larger, fully electric Explorer that prioritizes range, cabin space and advanced tech. I’ll walk through real-world running costs, driving feel, interior …
BYD Seal U
Ford Kuga
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal U and the Ford Kuga means weighing a sleek, tech‑forward electric from BYD against Ford’s practical compact crossover—their strengths point to very different priorities. I’ll look at performance, range/fuel economy, interior space, practicality and running costs to help you …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
Ford Kuga
GWM ORA 03

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
33,400 - 42,400 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,615 - 1,655 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
228 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,825 - 1,848 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
315 - 355 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
171 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
126 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
GWM
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.