Compare performance (243 HP vs 354 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 50,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Mercedes GLB?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and Mercedes GLB have carved out significant niches for themselves. Both vehicles present distinct differences and are packed with features that cater to various driving preferences and lifestyles. Let’s delve deeper into these two 2024 model year contenders and see how they stack up against each other.
The Ford Kuga’s exterior measurements include a length ranging between 4604 mm and 4645 mm, a width of 1882 mm, and a height between 1673 mm and 1681 mm. It boasts a modern look with an athletic stance, emphasizing functionality and space efficiency. On the other side, the Mercedes GLB offers a length between 4634 mm and 4650 mm, with a width up to 1850 mm and a height between 1665 mm and 1692 mm. The GLB exudes a more robust and upscale persona, often characteristic of the Mercedes-Benz brand, designed to captivate those with a taste for luxury.
The Ford Kuga provides a variety of engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. With power outputs ranging from 150 HP to 243 HP, it strikes a balance between efficiency and performance. Acceleration for the Kuga varies, with the plug-in hybrid leading at a brisk 7.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h. Meanwhile, the GLB offers a diverse range of petrol MHEV and diesel engines, with a power spectrum from 116 HP up to a powerful 320 HP. With a top acceleration of 5.5 seconds in its higher-spec iterations, the GLB delivers a punchier performance for drivers seeking a bit more thrill.
On the efficiency front, the Kuga’s plug-in hybrid impresses with a consumption rate of just 0.9 L/100km and an electric range of 69 km, tailored for eco-minded drivers. The GLB, while efficient for its segment, displays consumption numbers between 5.6 L/100km and 9 L/100km depending on the engine, staying efficient for conventional fuel options but not competing with the Kuga’s hybrid credentials.
Inside, the Ford Kuga supports a family-friendly setup with seating for five and a cargo space of 412 liters. The Mercedes GLB, however, takes a step further, allowing the same seating capacity but with a larger trunk at 570 liters, making it a more practical option for those who prioritize storage space.
Both SUVs come equipped with cutting-edge technology. The Ford Kuga integrates a suite of smart features, focusing heavily on connectivity and intuitive design aimed at enhancing driver experience. The Mercedes GLB, true to its lineage, incorporates advanced infotainment and safety systems, providing an unparalleled sense of luxury and control.
The Ford Kuga and Mercedes GLB each have their merits, with the Kuga offering versatility and hybrid efficiency while the GLB delivers a premium experience with powerful engine options and superior storage capacity. The ultimate decision may rest with brand preference, budget, and specific driving needs. Enthusiasts and potential buyers are invited to test drive these impressive SUVs to truly experience the compelling qualities each has to offer.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Kuga is considerably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mercedes GLB costs 50,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,370 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes GLB offers considerably more range – reaching up to 631 km, about 563 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLB offers visibly more power – delivering 354 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 111 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLB is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLB delivers significantly more torque with 515 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 275 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is substantially lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 674 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries barely more – 550 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
The Mercedes GLB is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
The Mercedes GLB is a practical compact SUV that mixes boxy, family-friendly space with premium German polish, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want usefulness without pretension. It drives with a confident, composed feel and somehow manages to look both rugged and refined — the grown-up SUV that still likes to have fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
Price
50,600 - 62,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
614 - 631 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
540 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
Width
1,861 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 354 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 7.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
335 - 515 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 260 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España