VS

Ford Kuga vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Mitsubishi Colt?

Ford Kuga vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h

Mitsubishi Colt

  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Colt is significantly cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,080 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mitsubishi Colt with 4.2 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.

Colt

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers clearly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 100 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Kuga delivers markedly more torque with 240 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is clearly lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 337 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries markedly more – 550 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 165 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 68 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Ford Kuga
Ford Capri
VS
The Ford Kuga is the modern, family-ready compact SUV — sensible, tech-savvy and built for school runs, weekend getaways and minimal fuss. The Ford Capri is the cheeky classic coupe: a slice of retro charisma and driver-focused flair that trades boot space and back seats for pure personality.
Ford Kuga
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW
FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_PHEV_024-LOW

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
serpimg_IA2rJY

Reviews Mitsubishi Colt

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Ford Kuga
Peugeot 3008
VS
The Ford Kuga is the all-rounder that hustles through bends with eager steering and practical space to spare, while the Peugeot 3008 plays the style card with a plush, sculpted interior and a calmer, more refined ride. Pick the Kuga if you want driving engagement and value, choose the 3008 if cabin …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Ford Focus
Ford Kuga
VS
The Ford Focus is the sharp, pocket-sized hatchback that rewards anyone who enjoys direct steering, low running costs and a sporty feel on twisty roads, while the Ford Kuga trades that agility for a higher driving position, roomier cabin and SUV practicality that suits families and weekend …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Ford Kuga drives with a bit more panache—sharper steering, punchier engines and the kind of gadgetry that makes motorway miles fly by—while the Skoda Karoq quietly wins hearts with sensible packaging, excellent practicality and the sort of roominess that swallows weekend luggage without …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
BYD Seal U
Ford Kuga
VS
In a clash of electrified titans, the BYD Seal U and the Ford Kuga vie for supremacy in the competitive SUV segment. The BYD Seal U impresses with its futuristic design and cutting-edge electric powertrains, making it a standout for eco-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Ford Kuga offers a balanced …
Ford Kuga
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
-
Length
4,053 mm
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
1,439 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.