VS

Ford Kuga vs Skoda Elroq comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 32,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Skoda Elroq?

Ford Kuga vs Skoda Elroq: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly lighter
details

Skoda Elroq

4.5 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kuga

As the SUV market continues to evolve, two contenders have emerged that cater to a diverse range of demands: the Ford Kuga and the Skoda Elroq. Both vehicles promise a blend of versatility, technology, and performance, but each brings a unique flavor to the segment. In this comparison, we will delve deeply into their technical specifications, innovations, and overall appeal.

Elroq

Design and Dimensions

Both the Ford Kuga and Skoda Elroq exhibit a commanding presence on the road, yet their dimensions slightly differ. The Kuga is longer, measuring between 4604 mm and 4645 mm, while the Elroq stands at 4488 mm. The Kuga is also a touch taller at up to 1681 mm compared to the Elroq's 1625 mm height. Width-wise, both vehicles are comparable, with the Kuga at 1882 mm and the Elroq slightly wider at 1884 mm. This extra width gives the Elroq a more stable stance, particularly beneficial in tight cornering situations.

Kuga

Powertrains and Performance

The Ford Kuga offers a more varied lineup when it comes to powertrains. Customers can choose between petrol engines, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid options, with power outputs ranging from 150 HP to an impressive 243 HP. The Kuga also boasts performance specifications that include 0-100 km/h times ranging from 7.3 seconds to 9.5 seconds depending on the variant. It's available with both a manual and a CVT automatic transmission, catering to different driving preferences.

In contrast, the Skoda Elroq embraces electric mobility with a line of electric drivetrains. The Elroq's power ranges from 170 HP to 285 HP, delivering a brisk acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 6.6 seconds for the more potent options. The Elroq's rear-wheel-drive system provides a different driving dynamic, emphasizing smooth acceleration and handling, although the maximum speed is capped at 180 km/h.

Elroq

Efficiency and Driving Range

When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Kuga's hybrids shine, with consumption figures as low as 0.9 L/100 km for the plug-in variant. However, the Elroq takes the lead in the electric domain, offering a remarkable range of up to 580 km on a single charge with its larger 77 kWh battery. The Kuga's hybrid variants can feature electric-only ranges of up to 69 km, but they can't match the continuous electric performance of the Elroq.

Kuga

Interior Comfort and Technology

Inside the Ford Kuga, the cabin is designed with comfort and user-friendliness in mind. It offers ample space for five passengers and a trunk capacity of up to 412 L, ensuring practicality for everyday use. Features such as an intuitive infotainment system and advanced driver-assistance technologies are included to enhance the driving experience.

The Skoda Elroq, on the other hand, takes a minimalist approach with high-quality materials and a spacious interior boasting a trunk capacity of 470 L. It incorporates top-tier connectivity options and safety technologies, leveraging its electric architecture to provide a futuristic driving environment.

Elroq

Innovations and Eco-Friendliness

Both the Kuga and Elroq focus on sustainability but in different ways. The Kuga emphasizes hybrid solutions that ease the transition for those still reliant on traditional fuels, while the Elroq stands firmly in the electric future, boasting a CO2 efficiency class of A, signifying zero emissions during operation.

Ford's innovations in the Kuga include adaptive cruise control and a suite of co-pilot technologies aimed at enhancing safety and driving ease. Meanwhile, the Elroq offers advanced AI features for smarter energy management and navigation, showcasing Skoda's commitment to pioneering technology in the EV sector.

Kuga

Conclusion

Choosing between the Ford Kuga and Skoda Elroq ultimately depends on individual preferences and driving needs. The Kuga appeals to those seeking a hybrid solution with versatile options and robust performance, whereas the Elroq caters to the environmentally conscious driver looking for an electric vehicle that combines modern design with impressive range and technology. As the automotive landscape continues to evolve, both vehicles stand as testaments to their respective brands' commitments to innovation and sustainability.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Elroq is very slightly cheaper – starting at 32,000 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,194 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 574 km, about 506 km more than the Ford Kuga.

Elroq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers visibly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 97 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 439 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is markedly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 2,036 kg. The difference is around 510 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries very slightly more – 550 kg compared to 549 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Elroq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £32,000
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 441 - 574 km
Ford Kuga
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details

Skoda Elroq

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

details
Ford Kuga
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
470 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,884 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
482 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.