Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Convertible vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (446 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (56,900 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Convertible or Mazda CX-60?
Ford Mustang Convertible vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Convertible
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-60 is visibly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Ford Mustang Convertible costs 56,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,243 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Mustang Convertible with 12.3 L/100km. The difference is about 8.5 L/100km.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Convertible offers clearly more power – delivering 446 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 119 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Convertible is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers very slightly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Mustang Convertible
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-60 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Convertible is only slightly lighter – 1,876 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 14 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries significantly more – 612 kg compared to 324 kg. That’s a difference of about 288 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,700
Mazda CX-60
Ford Mustang Convertible
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Convertible
The Ford Mustang Convertible makes every drive feel like a small celebration, its exhaust note and open-air drama turning mundane routes into showstoppers. It’s a car that doubles as a weekend mood lifter and a credible everyday companion, blending swagger with surprising practicality.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Ford Mustang Convertible
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
56,900 - 59,900 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
12.3 - 12.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
280 - 282 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Convertible
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,876 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,916 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
319 - 324 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
446 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 5.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
540 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
8
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
328 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.