Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-60 or Volvo XC60 fits your lifestyle better.
The automotive market has been rapidly evolving, with manufacturers continuously pushing the envelope in terms of technology, design, and performance. Today, we will explore a compelling comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60. Both SUVs stand out in their respective segments, but which one offers more value for money? Let’s dive into the details.
Starting with the aesthetics, both the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 boast modern and elegant designs. The CX-60 measures 4745 mm in length, 1890 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height, providing a robust presence on the road. The XC60, meanwhile, is slightly shorter at 4688 mm, with a width of 1902 mm and a height of 1658 mm. While the CX-60 offers a more muscular look, the Volvo presents a sleek and sophisticated profile that is unmistakably Scandinavian.
Under the hood, the Mazda CX-60 provides a range of engine options, including a 2.5-liter plugin hybrid generating up to 327 HP and a diesel MHEV option with 200 HP. With acceleration times ranging from 5.8 seconds for the hybrid to 8.4 seconds for the diesel variant, the CX-60 prioritizes both performance and efficiency. Offering an all-wheel or rear-wheel-drive system, it caters to diverse driving preferences.
In stark contrast, the Volvo XC60 showcases a formidable lineup, highlighted by a plugin hybrid variant with a maximum output of 455 HP. Its range of engines also includes petrol MHEV options that deliver robust performance, with the fastest variant achieving 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. While the XC60 is known for its spirited performance, it sacrifices some fuel efficiency compared to its Mazda counterpart, especially with a consumption figure that goes up to 7.7 L/100km.
When it comes to technological advancements, both models shine in different ways. The Mazda CX-60 introduces an intuitive infotainment system seamlessly integrated into its elegant cabin. With a focus on driver engagement, features such as a head-up display, adaptive cruise control, and comprehensive safety systems like Mazda’s i-Activsense are part of the offering.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 prides itself on an extensive array of safety features, backed by Volvo’s renowned commitment to occupant protection. Its Sensus Connect system provides a user-friendly interface while delivering cutting-edge connectivity. Notably, the XC60 also offers pilot assist technology, enhancing both safety and the driving experience.
Inside the CX-60, you are met with premium materials and a spacious ambience, with a trunk capacity of 570 liters, ideal for families and long trips. The vehicle seats five comfortably, with excellent legroom and headroom throughout.
The XC60, while slightly less capacious with a trunk capacity of 483 liters, provides an equally luxurious interior setting. Known for its ergonomic design and high-quality finishes, it excels in offering both comfort and practicality, making it a great choice for those who prioritize a sophisticated travel experience.
Efficiency is a crucial factor in today’s automotive landscape. The Mazda CX-60 hybrid variant boasts an impressive electric range of 64 km, with CO2 emissions as low as 31 g/km, aligning with modern environmental standards. Its hybrid technology showcases Mazda’s commitment to sustainability without compromising on performance.
Conversely, the Volvo XC60 leads in electric range with its hybrid version reaching up to 80 km, and CO2 emissions as low as 22 g/km in selected configurations. With a 14.7 kWh battery capacity for its hybrids, Volvo emphasizes both efficiency and the use of innovative technologies in their offerings.
Choosing between the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities. The CX-60 shines with its performance and innovative features at a more attractive price point, making it an outstanding value proposition. In contrast, the XC60 excels in luxury, safety, and cutting-edge technology, catering to those who seek a premium SUV experience.
Whichever SUV you choose, both the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 present exceptional options that combine innovation, safety, and performance in the ever-competitive automotive market.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-60 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 7286 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 1.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Volvo XC60 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 82 km, about 18 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs slightly better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls evident stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1890 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 10 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more room – 570 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 87 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs slightly better – up to 1726 L, which is about 183 L more than the Volvo XC60.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 slightly takes the win – 612 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.
The Mazda CX-60 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
4745 mm
|
Length
4708 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1902 mm
|
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España