VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo XC60 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (327 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (43700 £ vs 49200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Volvo XC60?

CX-60

The automotive market has been rapidly evolving, with manufacturers continuously pushing the envelope in terms of technology, design, and performance. Today, we will explore a compelling comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60. Both SUVs stand out in their respective segments, but which one offers more value for money? Let’s dive into the details.

XC60

Design and Dimensions

Starting with the aesthetics, both the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 boast modern and elegant designs. The CX-60 measures 4745 mm in length, 1890 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height, providing a robust presence on the road. The XC60, meanwhile, is slightly shorter at 4688 mm, with a width of 1902 mm and a height of 1658 mm. While the CX-60 offers a more muscular look, the Volvo presents a sleek and sophisticated profile that is unmistakably Scandinavian.

CX-60

Powertrains and Performance

Under the hood, the Mazda CX-60 provides a range of engine options, including a 2.5-liter plugin hybrid generating up to 327 HP and a diesel MHEV option with 200 HP. With acceleration times ranging from 5.8 seconds for the hybrid to 8.4 seconds for the diesel variant, the CX-60 prioritizes both performance and efficiency. Offering an all-wheel or rear-wheel-drive system, it caters to diverse driving preferences.

In stark contrast, the Volvo XC60 showcases a formidable lineup, highlighted by a plugin hybrid variant with a maximum output of 455 HP. Its range of engines also includes petrol MHEV options that deliver robust performance, with the fastest variant achieving 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. While the XC60 is known for its spirited performance, it sacrifices some fuel efficiency compared to its Mazda counterpart, especially with a consumption figure that goes up to 7.7 L/100km.

XC60

Innovations and Technology

When it comes to technological advancements, both models shine in different ways. The Mazda CX-60 introduces an intuitive infotainment system seamlessly integrated into its elegant cabin. With a focus on driver engagement, features such as a head-up display, adaptive cruise control, and comprehensive safety systems like Mazda’s i-Activsense are part of the offering.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 prides itself on an extensive array of safety features, backed by Volvo’s renowned commitment to occupant protection. Its Sensus Connect system provides a user-friendly interface while delivering cutting-edge connectivity. Notably, the XC60 also offers pilot assist technology, enhancing both safety and the driving experience.

CX-60

Interior Comfort and Space

Inside the CX-60, you are met with premium materials and a spacious ambience, with a trunk capacity of 570 liters, ideal for families and long trips. The vehicle seats five comfortably, with excellent legroom and headroom throughout.

The XC60, while slightly less capacious with a trunk capacity of 483 liters, provides an equally luxurious interior setting. Known for its ergonomic design and high-quality finishes, it excels in offering both comfort and practicality, making it a great choice for those who prioritize a sophisticated travel experience.

XC60

Efficiency and Sustainability

Efficiency is a crucial factor in today’s automotive landscape. The Mazda CX-60 hybrid variant boasts an impressive electric range of 64 km, with CO2 emissions as low as 31 g/km, aligning with modern environmental standards. Its hybrid technology showcases Mazda’s commitment to sustainability without compromising on performance.

Conversely, the Volvo XC60 leads in electric range with its hybrid version reaching up to 80 km, and CO2 emissions as low as 22 g/km in selected configurations. With a 14.7 kWh battery capacity for its hybrids, Volvo emphasizes both efficiency and the use of innovative technologies in their offerings.

CX-60

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities. The CX-60 shines with its performance and innovative features at a more attractive price point, making it an outstanding value proposition. In contrast, the XC60 excels in luxury, safety, and cutting-edge technology, catering to those who seek a premium SUV experience.

Whichever SUV you choose, both the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 present exceptional options that combine innovation, safety, and performance in the ever-competitive automotive market.

Mazda CX-60

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-60 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 43700 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5520 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.80 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 82 km, about 19 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls evident stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1890 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 10 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more room – 570 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 87 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 slightly takes the win – 612 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km

Mazda CX-60

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

Price
43700 - 57900 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
-
Length
4708 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
-
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.