Mazda VS Volvo

VS

In a head-to-head comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. The CX-60 impresses with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, while the XC60 shines in terms of luxury and advanced safety features. Ultimately, choosing between these two well-rounded SUVs will depend on whether you prioritize sporty performance or a plush, tech-savvy ride.

Mazda

details

Volvo

details

The automotive market has been rapidly evolving, with manufacturers continuously pushing the envelope in terms of technology, design, and performance. Today, we will explore a compelling comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60. Both SUVs stand out in their respective segments, but which one offers more value for money? Let’s dive into the details.

Design and Dimensions

Starting with the aesthetics, both the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 boast modern and elegant designs. The CX-60 measures 4745 mm in length, 1890 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height, providing a robust presence on the road. The XC60, meanwhile, is slightly shorter at 4688 mm, with a width of 1902 mm and a height of 1658 mm. While the CX-60 offers a more muscular look, the Volvo presents a sleek and sophisticated profile that is unmistakably Scandinavian.

Powertrains and Performance

Under the hood, the Mazda CX-60 provides a range of engine options, including a 2.5-liter plugin hybrid generating up to 327 HP and a diesel MHEV option with 200 HP. With acceleration times ranging from 5.8 seconds for the hybrid to 8.4 seconds for the diesel variant, the CX-60 prioritizes both performance and efficiency. Offering an all-wheel or rear-wheel-drive system, it caters to diverse driving preferences.

In stark contrast, the Volvo XC60 showcases a formidable lineup, highlighted by a plugin hybrid variant with a maximum output of 455 HP. Its range of engines also includes petrol MHEV options that deliver robust performance, with the fastest variant achieving 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. While the XC60 is known for its spirited performance, it sacrifices some fuel efficiency compared to its Mazda counterpart, especially with a consumption figure that goes up to 7.7 L/100km.

Innovations and Technology

When it comes to technological advancements, both models shine in different ways. The Mazda CX-60 introduces an intuitive infotainment system seamlessly integrated into its elegant cabin. With a focus on driver engagement, features such as a head-up display, adaptive cruise control, and comprehensive safety systems like Mazda’s i-Activsense are part of the offering.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 prides itself on an extensive array of safety features, backed by Volvo’s renowned commitment to occupant protection. Its Sensus Connect system provides a user-friendly interface while delivering cutting-edge connectivity. Notably, the XC60 also offers pilot assist technology, enhancing both safety and the driving experience.

Interior Comfort and Space

Inside the CX-60, you are met with premium materials and a spacious ambience, with a trunk capacity of 570 liters, ideal for families and long trips. The vehicle seats five comfortably, with excellent legroom and headroom throughout.

The XC60, while slightly less capacious with a trunk capacity of 483 liters, provides an equally luxurious interior setting. Known for its ergonomic design and high-quality finishes, it excels in offering both comfort and practicality, making it a great choice for those who prioritize a sophisticated travel experience.

Efficiency and Sustainability

Efficiency is a crucial factor in today’s automotive landscape. The Mazda CX-60 hybrid variant boasts an impressive electric range of 64 km, with CO2 emissions as low as 31 g/km, aligning with modern environmental standards. Its hybrid technology showcases Mazda’s commitment to sustainability without compromising on performance.

Conversely, the Volvo XC60 leads in electric range with its hybrid version reaching up to 80 km, and CO2 emissions as low as 22 g/km in selected configurations. With a 14.7 kWh battery capacity for its hybrids, Volvo emphasizes both efficiency and the use of innovative technologies in their offerings.

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities. The CX-60 shines with its performance and innovative features at a more attractive price point, making it an outstanding value proposition. In contrast, the XC60 excels in luxury, safety, and cutting-edge technology, catering to those who seek a premium SUV experience.

Whichever SUV you choose, both the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 present exceptional options that combine innovation, safety, and performance in the ever-competitive automotive market.

Mazda
Volvo

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 40600 - 56100 £
Price
about 48800 - 74600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 7.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
79 - 80 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
22 - 174 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4688 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1658 mm
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
Top speed
200 - 219 km/h
Top speed
180 km/h

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.