VS

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison

Compare performance (446 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (56,900 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Convertible or Mitsubishi Colt?

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences

Ford Mustang Convertible

  • considerably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mitsubishi Colt

  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Convertible

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Colt is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Ford Mustang Convertible costs 56,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 38,752 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Mustang Convertible with 12.3 L/100km. The difference is about 8.1 L/100km.

Colt

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Convertible offers considerably more power – delivering 446 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 303 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Convertible is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Convertible delivers clearly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 380 Nm more.

Mustang Convertible

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mitsubishi Colt offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is considerably lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,876 kg. The difference is around 687 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Colt carries a bit more – 385 kg compared to 324 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Colt is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,200
Colt

Mitsubishi Colt

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 91 - 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Ford Mustang Convertible
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Convertible

The Ford Mustang Convertible makes every drive feel like a small celebration, its exhaust note and open-air drama turning mundane routes into showstoppers. It’s a car that doubles as a weekend mood lifter and a credible everyday companion, blending swagger with surprising practicality.

details

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
Ford Mustang Convertible
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption

Price
56,900 - 59,900 £
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Consumption L/100km
12.3 - 12.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
280 - 282 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Convertible
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,876 kg
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
-
Length
4,053 mm
Width
1,916 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
1,439 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Payload
319 - 324 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
446 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 5.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
540 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
328 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.