VS

Mitsubishi Colt vs Toyota Aygo comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (18200 £ vs 18800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Toyota Aygo?

Mitsubishi Colt vs Toyota Aygo: Key differences

Mitsubishi Colt

  • hardly perceptible cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • clearly more trunk space

Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • to a small extent more efficient
  • hardly perceptible quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • barely noticeable lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Colt

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Colt has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18200 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 686 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 3.70 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Mitsubishi Colt with 4.20 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Aygo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Colt has a slightly edge – offering 143 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Aygo is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 9.20 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.30 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi Colt pulls noticeable stronger with 160 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mitsubishi Colt offers somewhat more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is barely noticeable lighter – 1090 kg compared to 1189 kg. The difference is around 99 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Colt offers clearly more room – 391 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 160 L.

When it comes to payload, Toyota Aygo slight takes the win – 420 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Colt sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mitsubishi Colt
Toyota Aygo

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £18,200
Colt

Mitsubishi Colt

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 91 - 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.2 - 5.3 L

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details

Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.

details
Mitsubishi Colt
Toyota Aygo

Costs and Consumption

Price
18200 - 25000 £
Price
18800 - 24300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L
Consumption L/100km
3.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
96 - 119 g/km
co2
85 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1189 - 1380 kg
Curb weight
1090 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Trunk capacity
231 L
Length
4053 mm
Length
-
Width
1798 mm
Width
1740 mm
Height
1439 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1069 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
381 - 385 kg
Payload
420 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Power HP
116 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.20 s
Max Speed
174 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Torque
120 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Power kW
85 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1490 cm3

General

Model Year
2023 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Toyota
Is the Mitsubishi Colt offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi Colt is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.