Compare performance (143 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (18200 £ vs 15500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Toyota Aygo?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Toyota Aygo has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15500 £ , while the Mitsubishi Colt costs 18200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2657 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 3.70 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Mitsubishi Colt with 4.20 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Colt has a slightly edge – offering 143 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Aygo is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 9.20 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.30 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mitsubishi Colt performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 174 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi Colt pulls noticeable stronger with 160 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mitsubishi Colt offers somewhat more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is a bit lighter – 1015 kg compared to 1189 kg. The difference is around 174 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Colt offers clearly more room – 391 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 160 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi Colt performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1069 L, which is about 240 L more than the Toyota Aygo.
When it comes to payload, Toyota Aygo slight takes the win – 420 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
The Mitsubishi Colt sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
detailsThe Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18200 - 25000 £
|
Price
15500 - 24300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
co2
85 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1189 - 1380 kg
|
Curb weight
1015 - 1090 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
4053 mm
|
Length
3700 mm
|
|
Width
1798 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
1439 mm
|
Height
1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1069 L
|
Max trunk capacity
829 L
|
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Payload
345 - 420 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
72 - 116 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
Max Speed
151 - 158 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
Torque
93 - 120 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
53 - 85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1490 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is available as Front-Wheel Drive.