VS

Kia Stonic vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison

Compare performance (115 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (20,400 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Stonic or Mitsubishi Colt?

Kia Stonic vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences

Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
details

Mitsubishi Colt

  • somewhat cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Stonic

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi Colt is somewhat cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Kia Stonic costs 20,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,229 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.

Colt

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Colt offers a bit more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Colt is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.3 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.7 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia Stonic delivers moderately more torque with 200 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Stonic

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is barely lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,205 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Colt offers marginally more boot space – 391 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 39 L.

When it comes to payload, the Kia Stonic carries slightly more – 445 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Colt holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,200
Colt

Mitsubishi Colt

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 91 - 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Stonic
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted …
Kia Picanto
Kia Stonic
VS
The Kia Picanto and Kia Stonic are closely related but aimed at different needs: the Picanto is a pint-sized city hatch built for nimble urban driving and low running costs, while the Stonic is a small crossover that adds higher seating, extra boot space and a more rugged presence. This comparison …
Kia Stonic
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Stonic

The Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that pairs nimble city manners with a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin. It’s a practical, well-equipped choice for buyers who value sensible features, approachable styling and easy everyday usability.

details
Kia_Stonic_MY22_04
Kia_Stonic_MY22_16
Kia_Stonic_MY22_15
Kia_Stonic_MY22_08
Kia_Stonic_MJ22_05

Reviews Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jan
18 Mar 2026, 07:19:10

Very good car, uses little fuel, nothing's gone wrong in 4 years, no breakdowns.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ennio
4 Feb 2026, 13:19:36

I'm very satisfied — I have a Stonic Black Edition hybrid, and I haven't had any problems after two years.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
All-New COLT_003

Reviews Mitsubishi Colt

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai i20
Kia Stonic
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai i20 and the Kia Stonic comes down to whether you value the i20’s refined hatchback driving dynamics and efficient packaging or the Stonic’s higher ride height, SUV-like presence and slightly more practical load space. I’ll compare their engines, interior space, …
Hyundai Bayon
Kia Stonic
VS
Small crossover, big decisions: the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic duke it out in the compact SUV ring, each promising city-smarts, style and sensible running costs. One brings bold tech and fresh looks, the other leans on practicality and value — so let’s see which small SUV deserves your keys (and …
Kia Stonic
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Kia Stonic and the Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and stylish looks or interior space and everyday practicality. The Stonic offers eye-catching design and a peppy, value-oriented drive, while the Kamiq delivers superior cabin quality, …
Dacia Sandero
Kia Stonic
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Kia Stonic target buyers who want compact practicality, but they take very different approaches — Sandero focuses on low cost and straightforward utility while the Stonic offers more style, features and refinement. This quick comparison highlights where each model shines so …
Kia Niro
Kia Stonic
VS
The Kia Niro and Kia Stonic step into the compact crossover ring with very different tricks up their sleeves — the Niro is the sensible, efficiency-first all-rounder, while the Stonic is the cheeky, city-savvy funster with a pocket-sized personality. Which one suits your life — long motorway miles …
Kia Stonic
Skoda Fabia
VS
Comparing the Kia Stonic and the Skoda Fabia helps you choose between a small crossover with raised ride height and SUV-like style, and a practical supermini that focuses on interior space, comfort and efficiency. I’ll run through the key differences in driving feel, passenger and luggage room, …
Kia Stonic
Renault Captur
VS
The Kia Stonic and Renault Captur are two well-known small SUVs that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and practical cabin space. This quick comparison looks at driving feel, interior comfort, running costs, safety and equipment to help you decide which suits your daily needs and …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Stonic
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Stonic are two popular compact crossovers that blend city-friendly size with SUV styling and efficient engines. This comparison focuses on the practical differences—space, driving feel, equipment and running costs—so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Kia Stonic
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,400 - 26,800 £
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 128 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Trunk capacity
352 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
-
Length
4,053 mm
Width
1,760 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
1,439 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Payload
440 - 445 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Kia
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Kia Stonic offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Stonic is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.