VS

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Suzuki Swift comparison

Compare performance (446 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (56,900 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Convertible or Suzuki Swift?

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Suzuki Swift: Key differences

Ford Mustang Convertible

  • considerably more power
details

Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Convertible

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Swift is clearly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Ford Mustang Convertible costs 56,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 39,772 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swift uses 4.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Mustang Convertible with 12.3 L/100km. The difference is about 7.9 L/100km.

Swift

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Convertible offers considerably more power – delivering 446 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 364 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Convertible delivers significantly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 428 Nm more.

Mustang Convertible

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Suzuki Swift offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is considerably lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,876 kg. The difference is around 807 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Convertible carries marginally more – 324 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Swift stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Swift

Suzuki Swift

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 82 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Suzuki Swift
Toyota Yaris
VS
Ring the bell for a city‑car showdown: the feisty Suzuki Swift takes on the ever‑practical Toyota Yaris. The Swift flirts with sporty handling and cheeky styling, while the Yaris trades pizzazz for polished build, frugal engines (including a sensible hybrid) and the kind of reliability that keeps …
Ford Mustang Convertible
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Convertible

The Ford Mustang Convertible makes every drive feel like a small celebration, its exhaust note and open-air drama turning mundane routes into showstoppers. It’s a car that doubles as a weekend mood lifter and a credible everyday companion, blending swagger with surprising practicality.

details
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_11-LOW
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_28-LOW
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_12-LOW
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_25-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Convertible

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Suzuki Ignis is the cheeky mini‑crossover — tall, practical and rugged enough to shrug off potholes and a weekend’s worth of kit — while the Suzuki Swift is the sprightly hatch that rewards sharper steering, brisk responses and a more engaging drive. Choose the Ignis for visibility, space and …
Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prioritise interior space and everyday practicality or a punchy, fun-to-drive hatchback with lower running costs. The Jazz is prized for its flexible cabin and comfortable urban manners, while the Swift offers sharper …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Fiat 500
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Fiat 500 and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prefer retro Italian charm and compact city style or a more practical, versatile hatchback with sharper handling. This comparison looks at space, fuel economy, driving feel, equipment and running costs to help you decide …
Opel Corsa
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Vauxhall Corsa and the Suzuki Swift are two of the UK’s most popular small cars, each promising easy city driving with sensible running costs. This quick comparison looks at what sets them apart in ride, economy, practicality and equipment to help you choose the better fit for your everyday …
Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Swift and the Suzuki Vitara comes down to whether you want a nimble city hatchback or a roomier compact SUV. The Swift excels with light steering, efficient running costs and easy parking, while the Vitara offers higher seating, more cargo space and light off-road …
Citroen C3
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you want a comfort-focused, characterful city car or a sharper, more spirited hatchback that rewards keen drivers. I'll compare their practicality, driving feel, running costs and equipment to help you pick the one that best …
Kia Stonic
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Stonic and Suzuki Swift are two popular subcompact hatchbacks that aim at drivers who want nimble city cars with sensible running costs. This quick comparison looks at driving manners, interior space, practicality and ownership costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Ford Mustang Convertible
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
Price
56,900 - 59,900 £
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Consumption L/100km
12.3 - 12.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
280 - 282 g/km
co2
98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Convertible
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,876 kg
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,916 mm
Width
1,735 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
319 - 324 kg
Payload
282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
446 HP
Power HP
82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 5.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
540 Nm
Torque
112 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
328 kW
Power kW
61 kW
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Ford Mustang Convertible offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Mustang Convertible is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.