Is the Kia Stonic offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Stonic is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Kia Stonic's engine?

Up to 115 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Kia Stonic use?

On average, the Kia Stonic consumes 5.60 L.

How many liters of cargo space does the Kia Stonic offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 352 L fit inside.

What are the Kia Stonic’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Kia Stonic is 4165 mm long, 1760 mm wide and 1520 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the Suzuki Swift have?

The Suzuki Swift is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Suzuki Swift deliver on the road?

Up to 82 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Suzuki Swift in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.40 L.

What maximum speed does the Suzuki Swift reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 170 km/h.

How big is the Suzuki Swift overall?

Overall, the Suzuki Swift is 3860 mm long, 1735 mm wide and 1485 mm high.

Kia Stonic vs Suzuki Swift - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Stonic

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Swift has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17100 £ , while the Kia Stonic costs 20100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2992 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Swift manages with 4.40 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.60 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.

Swift

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia Stonic has a distinct edge – offering 115 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 33 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Kia Stonic performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 182 km/h, while the Suzuki Swift tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia Stonic pulls significantly stronger with 200 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 88 Nm difference.

Stonic

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki Swift is to a small extent lighter – 1069 kg compared to 1205 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia Stonic offers clearly perceptible more room – 352 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 87 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia Stonic performs a bit better – up to 1155 L, which is about 175 L more than the Suzuki Swift.

When it comes to payload, Kia Stonic evident takes the win – 445 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 149 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Kia Stonic proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Kia Stonic is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Kia Stonic

Reviews Suzuki Swift

Top Car Comparisons

Hyundai i10

Suzuki Swift

VS

The Hyundai i10 is the sensible city slicker — compact, surprisingly roomy for its size, cheap to run and designed to make parking a confidence exercise rather than a stressful workout. The Suzuki Swift is the cheeky, slightly sportier option with sharper handling and bolder looks, so pick it if …

Suzuki Swift

Toyota Aygo

VS

If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …

Costs and Consumption
Price 20100 - 26600 £	Price 17100 - 21200 £
Consumption L/100km 5.6 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 127 - 133 g/km	co2 98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 45 L	Fuel tank capacity 37 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1205 - 1270 kg	Curb weight 1069 - 1145 kg
Trunk capacity 352 L	Trunk capacity 265 L
Length 4165 mm	Length 3860 mm
Width 1760 mm	Width 1735 mm
Height 1520 mm	Height 1485 - 1510 mm
Max trunk capacity 1155 L	Max trunk capacity 980 L
Payload 440 - 445 kg	Payload 282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 100 - 115 HP	Power HP 82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.7 - 12.1 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h -
Max Speed 179 - 182 km/h	Max Speed 160 - 170 km/h
Torque 172 - 200 Nm	Torque 112 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 3
Power kW 74 - 85 kW	Power kW 61 kW
Engine capacity 998 cm3	Engine capacity 1197 cm3