VS

Ford Mustang Coupe vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (453 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (51,800 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Coupe or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Ford Mustang Coupe vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Ford Mustang Coupe

  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Coupe

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Ford Mustang Coupe costs 51,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,123 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Mustang Coupe with 12 L/100km. The difference is about 7.1 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Coupe offers clearly more power – delivering 453 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 382 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Coupe is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 9.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Coupe delivers clearly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 438 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mitsubishi Space Star offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,808 kg. The difference is around 868 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Space Star carries moderately more – 400 kg compared to 334 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £11,600
Space Star

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 71 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Ford Mustang Coupe
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Coupe

The Ford Mustang Coupe wears its muscle on its sleeve, delivering a raw, grin-inducing driving experience that turns everyday roads into a little theater of noise and swagger. Inside it's surprisingly livable for regular use, so if you want headline-grabbing looks and a proper driver's car without pretending to be a luxury cruiser, the Mustang coupe is a very entertaining choice.

details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
Ford Mustang Coupe
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

Price
51,800 - 65,600 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
12 - 12.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
275 - 282 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,808 - 1,837 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
-
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,916 - 1,917 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
-
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
327 - 334 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
446 - 453 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 5.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
540 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
328 - 334 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.