VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Ferrari 296 Roadster comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 880 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 396,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Ferrari 296 Roadster?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Ferrari 296 Roadster: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
details

Ferrari 296 Roadster

  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Mustang Mach-E is substantially cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Ferrari 296 Roadster costs 396,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 347,572 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 585 km more than the Ferrari 296 Roadster.

296 Roadster

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari 296 Roadster offers substantially more power – delivering 880 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 393 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari 296 Roadster is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.8 s, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E takes 3.8 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 755 Nm. That’s about 195 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Mustang Mach-E offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Ferrari 296 Roadster is visibly lighter – 1,760 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 401 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries considerably more – 450 kg compared to 220 kg. That’s a difference of about 230 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri and the Ford Mustang Mach-E represent two very different takes on driving pleasure—one a classic sporty coupe with nostalgic charm, the other a modern all-electric crossover with high-tech performance. This comparison will help you weigh classic style and driving feel against …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ferrari 296 Roadster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
Roel
10 Jun 2026, 04:25:36

Incredibly beautiful SUV. The most beautiful one out there in terms of style.
The interior could be a bit more modern... but the seats feel amazing.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

Ferrari 296 Roadster

The Ferrari 296 GTS marries dramatic mid‑engine styling with razor‑sharp handling and a soundtrack that insists you drive it like you stole it. With the roof down it becomes an intoxicating open‑top thoroughbred that somehow also manages to be surprisingly usable day to day — a gorgeous, grin‑inducing reminder of why people fall for Ferraris.

details
serpimg_6LXpw0

Reviews Ferrari 296 Roadster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Jaguar I-Pace
VS
In the electrifying world of electric SUVs, the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Jaguar I-Pace stand out as fierce competitors. The Mustang Mach-E impresses with its sporty handling and spacious interior, offering a versatile solution for those seeking a fusion of performance and practicality. Meanwhile, …
CUPRA Tavascan
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan and the Ford Mustang Mach‑E are two electric SUVs that blend sporty performance with everyday practicality, but they take very different approaches to design, driving feel and technology. This comparison will help you see how the Tavascan’s sharp handling and striking CUPRA …
BYD Seal
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The BYD Seal and Ford Mustang Mach-E compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EX60
VS
Ford Mustang Mach-E and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
BMW iX3
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
Unsure whether the BMW iX3 or the Ford Mustang Mach-E is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
BYD Atto 3
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
BYD Atto 3 and Ford Mustang Mach-E go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VW ID.5
VS
Ford Mustang Mach-E and VW ID.5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the BYD Sealion 7 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ferrari 296 Roadster

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
396,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
8.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
15 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
218 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,760 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,958 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
220 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
880 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
755 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
6
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
648 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,992 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Ferrari
What drivetrain options does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.