VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes EQA - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (487 HP vs 292 HP), boot space and price (48400 £ vs 44200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mercedes EQA?

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3 (2 Reviews)
rate

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mercedes EQA has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 44200 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4191 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes EQA: with 14.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the Ford Mustang Mach-E with 17.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.30 kWh.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E performs slight better – achieving up to 600 km, about 39 km more than the Mercedes EQA.

EQA

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a decisively edge – offering 487 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 195 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 6 s. That’s about 2.20 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Mustang Mach-E pulls significantly stronger with 950 Nm compared to 520 Nm. That’s about 430 Nm difference.

Ad · Affiliate
Car accessories
Car accessories
Popular best-sellers for everyday use & care
View on Amazon →
Boot organiser
Boot organiser
Storage boxes, nets & anti-slip solutions
Open best-sellers →
Car dash cams
Car dash cams
Safety, parking mode & 4K recording
See top models →
Car phone holders
Car phone holders
MagSafe, vent mounts & dashboard mounts
Browse popular mounts →
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mercedes EQA is slight lighter – 2045 kg compared to 2161 kg. The difference is around 116 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers evident more room – 519 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 179 L.

When it comes to payload, Ford Mustang Mach-E minimal takes the win – 450 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3 (2 Reviews)
rate
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Reviews Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri is pure 1970s charisma — a lightweight, analogue coupe that thrills with raw charm and classic looks but asks you to forgive creature comforts, modern safety tech and everyday reliability. By contrast the Ford Mustang Mach‑E slaps Mustang attitude onto an electric, family-friendly …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
Price
48400 - 66900 £
Price
44200 - 57400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
70.50 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2161 - 2351 kg
Curb weight
2045 - 2115 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
340 L
Length
-
Length
4463 mm
Width
1881 mm
Width
1834 mm
Height
-
Height
1608 - 1613 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1320 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
160 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mercedes-Benz

Similar Comparisons

Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA and Volvo EX40 represent two distinct approaches to the compact electric SUV segment, each showcasing their brand’s unique philosophy. While the EQA excels in luxury and advanced technology, offering a seamless blend of comfort and performance, the EX40 prioritizes sustainability …
BMW iX1
Mercedes EQA
VS
The BMW iX1 is the feisty compact EV that still drives like a BMW, with sharper handling and a practical cabin, while the Mercedes EQA prefers to charm you with a softer ride and a more polished, luxe interior. Choose the iX1 for driver engagement and better value, or the EQA if you want plush …
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes EQB
VS
In the battle of electric luxury, the Mercedes EQA and EQB showcase the brand's commitment to sustainable performance. While the EQA offers a sleek, compact design ideal for urban environments, the EQB’s spacious interior and added versatility make it a compelling choice for families. Both models …
Mercedes CLA Coupe
Mercedes EQA
VS
In an electrifying matchup between the sleek Mercedes CLA Coupé and the innovative Mercedes EQA, drivers are offered a choice between potent gasoline dynamics and forward-thinking electric efficiency. The CLA Coupé enchants with its elegant design and turbocharged performance, tailored for driving …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Polestar 4
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Ford Mustang stands out with its iconic muscle car design and powerful engine options, appealing to traditional performance enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Polestar 2 redefines the electric vehicle landscape with its minimalist aesthetic and cutting-edge technology, …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Jaguar I-Pace
VS
In the electrifying world of electric SUVs, the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Jaguar I-Pace stand out as fierce competitors. The Mustang Mach-E impresses with its sporty handling and spacious interior, offering a versatile solution for those seeking a fusion of performance and practicality. Meanwhile, …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
BYD Sealion 7
VS
The Ford Mustang Mach-E and BYD Sealion 7 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the battle of compact luxury, the Mercedes EQA and GLA offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. While the EQA stands out with its electric powertrain and eco-friendly appeal, the GLA retains the versatility and familiar dynamics of a traditional combustion engine. …
What drive types are available for the Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.