VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes EQA comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 228 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 45,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mercedes EQA?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes EQA: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mercedes EQA is marginally cheaper – starting at 45,900 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,554 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQA is marginally more efficient: consuming 16.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 0.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers markedly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 124 km more than the Mercedes EQA.

EQA

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 228 HP. That’s roughly 259 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers considerably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 560 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQA is barely lighter – 2,115 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 46 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers markedly more boot space – 519 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 179 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries barely more – 450 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri is pure 1970s charisma — a lightweight, analogue coupe that thrills with raw charm and classic looks but asks you to forgive creature comforts, modern safety tech and everyday reliability. By contrast the Ford Mustang Mach‑E slaps Mustang attitude onto an electric, family-friendly …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.4
VS
The Mercedes EQA feels like a compact EV dressed for the boardroom — polished interior, serene ride and undeniable badge prestige, but you trade off some cabin space and a modest range for the name. The VW ID.4 is the sensible opposite: roomy, practical and better value with more usable range, …
BMW iX2
Mercedes EQA
VS
In the growing segment of electric compact SUVs, the BMW iX2 and Mercedes EQA stand out with their distinct charms and performance capabilities. The iX2 impresses with its sporty handling and innovative tech features, while the EQA offers a more luxurious and refined driving experience. Ultimately, …
CUPRA Tavascan
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
In a thrilling showdown between the CUPRA Tavascan and the Ford Mustang Mach-E, both electric SUVs bring their own unique flair to the table. The Tavascan impresses with its striking design and sporty performance, making it a compelling choice for those seeking an exhilarating driving experience. …
BMW iX1
Mercedes EQA
VS
The BMW iX1 is the feisty compact EV that still drives like a BMW, with sharper handling and a practical cabin, while the Mercedes EQA prefers to charm you with a softer ride and a more polished, luxe interior. Choose the iX1 for driver engagement and better value, or the EQA if you want plush …
Mercedes EQA
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Mercedes EQA and Skoda Enyaq compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the battle of compact luxury, the Mercedes EQA and GLA offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. While the EQA stands out with its electric powertrain and eco-friendly appeal, the GLA retains the versatility and familiar dynamics of a traditional combustion engine. …
Mercedes CLA Coupe
Mercedes EQA
VS
In an electrifying matchup between the sleek Mercedes CLA Coupé and the innovative Mercedes EQA, drivers are offered a choice between potent gasoline dynamics and forward-thinking electric efficiency. The CLA Coupé enchants with its elegant design and turbocharged performance, tailored for driving …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
476 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
340 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,834 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
228 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
390 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
168 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.