Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes EQS comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 585 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 80,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mercedes EQS?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes EQS: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Mercedes EQS costs 80,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,488 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQS is somewhat more efficient: consuming 15.5 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 2.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS offers visibly more range – reaching up to 920 km, about 320 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
EQS
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS offers moderately more power – delivering 585 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 98 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mercedes EQS takes 4.1 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers slightly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is moderately lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,550 kg. The difference is around 389 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQS offers moderately more boot space – 610 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS carries clearly more – 570 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQS holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £80,900
Mercedes EQS
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes EQS
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Mercedes EQS
The Mercedes EQS is a silent, spaceship-like flagship that turns electric luxury into zen on wheels, wrapped in a swooping design that insists on being admired. Inside it’s all glassy screens and soft-touch surfaces that make long trips feel like first class, and the driving experience is composed and effortless — like a courteous butler with an electric heart.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes EQS
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
80,900 - 117,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
810 - 920 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
2,550 - 2,660 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
610 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,926 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
545 - 570 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
367 - 585 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
505 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
270 - 430 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.