Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes Vito Transporter comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 28,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mercedes Vito Transporter?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes Vito Transporter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes Vito Transporter is considerably cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,646 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is moderately more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 21.2 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Vito Transporter. That’s a difference of about 3.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers visibly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 126 km more than the Mercedes Vito Transporter.
Vito Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 250 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers substantially more torque with 950 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 450 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Vito Transporter is moderately lighter – 1,916 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 245 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Transporter carries significantly more – 884 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 434 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Mercedes Vito Transporter
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.