VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EX60 comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 54,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Volvo EX60?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EX60: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

Volvo EX60

  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Mustang Mach-E is a bit cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,563 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX60 is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.7 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 810 km, about 210 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

EX60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 offers clearly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 193 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Volvo EX60 takes 3.9 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers somewhat more torque with 950 Nm compared to 790 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is very slightly lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,190 kg. The difference is around 29 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX60 offers very slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX60 carries very slightly more – 460 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 620 - 810 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 is a stylish electric SUV that pairs Scandinavian minimalism with a high-quality, comfortable cabin and an intuitive infotainment experience. It delivers a composed, refined ride with advanced safety and driver-assist systems that make daily driving relaxed and confident.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
54,000 - 70,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
620 - 810 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
2,190 - 2,425 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,899 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
435 - 460 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,026 - 2,027
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.