VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs NIO EL8 comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 653 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 71,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or NIO EL8?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs NIO EL8: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

NIO EL8

  • noticeably more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the NIO EL8 costs 71,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,629 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is slightly more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 21.2 kWh/100km for the NIO EL8. That’s a difference of about 3.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers moderately more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 90 km more than the NIO EL8.

EL8

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the NIO EL8 offers noticeably more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 166 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the NIO EL8 takes 4.1 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers somewhat more torque with 950 Nm compared to 850 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: NIO EL8 offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is markedly lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,613 kg. The difference is around 452 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more boot space – 519 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 254 L.

When it comes to payload, the NIO EL8 carries visibly more – 577 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 127 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
NIO EL8

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

NIO EL8

The NIO EL8 feels like a tech-savvy living room on wheels, blending upscale comfort with playful design for buyers who want electric refinement without the clinical vibe. It’s roomy, packed with clever features and a relaxed driving character that turns everyday trips into something a little more fun.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
NIO EL8

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
71,100 - 90,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
390 - 510 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
6
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
2,613 - 2,633 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
265 L
Length
-
Length
5,099 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,989 mm
Height
-
Height
1,750 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
810 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
557 - 577 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
653 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
850 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
480 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
NIO
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.