VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Renault Arkana – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Mustang Mach-E or Renault Arkana fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E @ mustang.fordpresskits.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Arkana has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48400 £. That’s a price difference of around 19971 £.

Arkana @ Renault

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a convincingly edge – offering 487 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 344 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 7 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Mustang Mach-E performs a bit better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Mustang Mach-E pulls decisively stronger with 950 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 745 Nm difference.

Mustang Mach-E @ mustang.fordpresskits.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Renault Arkana is convincingly lighter – 1510 kg compared to 2161 kg. The difference is around 651 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers slight more room – 519 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 39 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Mustang Mach-E performs to a small extent better – up to 1420 L, which is about 157 L more than the Renault Arkana.

When it comes to payload, Renault Arkana minimal takes the win – 451 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Mustang Mach-E is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,400
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Mustang Mach-E marks a new chapter in the legacy of the iconic American brand, combining classic muscle car aesthetics with modern electric vehicle technology. Its sleek design captures the spirit of innovation while offering a spacious and tech-savvy interior for enhanced driving comfort. The Mach-E promises an exhilarating driving experience, packed with cutting-edge features that set a new standard for electric SUVs.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW @ mustang.fordpresskits.com
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW @ mustang.fordpresskits.com
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW @ mustang.fordpresskits.com
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW @ mustang.fordpresskits.com
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW @ mustang.fordpresskits.com

Renault Arkana

4 (1)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p @ Renault
r210654p @ Renault
r210665p @ Renault
r210657p @ Renault
r210613p @ Renault
r210616p @ Renault

Similar Comparisons

Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, the Ford Mustang Mach‑E remains the more thrilling, style-forward choice for buyers who want smiles per mile.
Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri is pure 1970s charisma — a lightweight, analogue coupe that thrills with raw charm and classic looks but asks you to forgive creature comforts, modern safety tech and everyday reliability. By contrast the Ford Mustang Mach‑E slaps Mustang attitude onto an electric, family-friendly SUV with instant torque, roomy practicality and up‑to‑date tech, so if you want future‑proof performance the Mach‑E is the smarter, cleaner way to wear a pony badge.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Renault Arkana
Mustang Mach-E
Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
48400 - 66900 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
73 - 91 kWh
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2161 - 2351 kg
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
480 L
Length
4713 - 4743 mm
Length
4568 mm
Width
1881 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
1613 - 1624 mm
Height
1576 mm
Max trunk capacity
1345 - 1420 L
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
172 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the latest showdown between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz, two distinct design philosophies come to the forefront. The Arkana impresses with its sporty coupe-SUV silhouette and practical versatility, making it perfect for urban drivers who crave style and functionality. Meanwhile, the Symbioz, as a bold vision of the future, showcases advanced autonomous technologies and an eco-friendly design, making it a fascinating glimpse into how Renault is shaping the sustainable automotive landscape.
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana stands out with its sleek coupe-like design, appealing to those who prioritize style alongside functionality. Meanwhile, the Renault Rafale offers a more traditional SUV layout, emphasizing practicality and spaciousness for families and adventure-seekers. Both models showcase Renault's commitment to innovation and efficiency, making them strong contenders in their segment.
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious interior, making it ideal for families. Ultimately, choosing between these two models comes down to personal style and practicality, providing consumers with impressive options from Renault's growing lineup.
Ford Kuga
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Jaguar I-Pace
VS
In the electrifying world of electric SUVs, the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Jaguar I-Pace stand out as fierce competitors. The Mustang Mach-E impresses with its sporty handling and spacious interior, offering a versatile solution for those seeking a fusion of performance and practicality. Meanwhile, the Jaguar I-Pace captures attention with its luxurious design and agile performance, making it a compelling choice for enthusiasts craving a premium electric experience.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Polestar 4
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Ford Mustang stands out with its iconic muscle car design and powerful engine options, appealing to traditional performance enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Polestar 2 redefines the electric vehicle landscape with its minimalist aesthetic and cutting-edge technology, offering a sustainable yet thrilling driving experience. Both cars represent their respective brand philosophies, catering to distinct drivers while pushing the boundaries of performance and innovation.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Lucid Air
VS
Renault Arkana
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Arkana brings a sleek coupe-inspired design coupled with a robust performance, contrasting with the upcoming Dacia Bigster, which promises a rugged and spacious ride. The Arkana offers a more premium feel with its refined handling and advanced technology suite, whereas the Bigster is expected to attract adventure-seekers looking for practicality and an affordable price tag. As both models vie for attention, potential buyers will have to weigh Renault's stylish sophistication against Dacia's utilitarian charm.
What drive types are available for the Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.