Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota Urban Cruiser comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Toyota Urban Cruiser?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota Urban Cruiser: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota Urban Cruiser is considerably cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,008 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota Urban Cruiser is somewhat more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers visibly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 174 km more than the Toyota Urban Cruiser.
Urban Cruiser
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers significantly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 303 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Toyota Urban Cruiser takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers significantly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 643 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Urban Cruiser is a bit lighter – 1,839 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 322 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more boot space – 519 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 209 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries very slightly more – 450 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Toyota Urban Cruiser
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a compact SUV that offers a blend of style and practicality, making it well-suited for urban living. It captures attention with its bold design, while providing a high driving position that enhances visibility and control on city roads. Inside, the Urban Cruiser offers comfortable seating and a range of features that cater to both driver and passengers, emphasizing convenience and everyday usability.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
33,400 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
395 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,839 - 1,939 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
306 - 310 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
411 - 421 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
174 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 8.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
128 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.