VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EC40 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (487 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (48400 £ vs 46600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Volvo EC40?

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3 (2 Reviews)
rate

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo EC40 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 46600 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1808 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Volvo EC40: with 16.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Ford Mustang Mach-E with 17.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.50 kWh.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 600 km, about 16 km more than the Volvo EC40.

EC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a minimal edge – offering 487 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Volvo EC40 takes 4.60 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Mustang Mach-E pulls distinct stronger with 950 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm difference.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo EC40 is barely noticeable lighter – 2065 kg compared to 2161 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers distinct more room – 519 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.

When it comes to payload, Ford Mustang Mach-E minimal takes the win – 450 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
310887_Volvo_C40_Recharge_Pure_Electric

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3 (2 Reviews)
rate
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Reviews Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri is pure 1970s charisma — a lightweight, analogue coupe that thrills with raw charm and classic looks but asks you to forgive creature comforts, modern safety tech and everyday reliability. By contrast the Ford Mustang Mach‑E slaps Mustang attitude onto an electric, family-friendly …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
48400 - 66900 £
Price
46600 - 59000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2161 - 2351 kg
Curb weight
2065 - 2185 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
404 L
Length
-
Length
4440 mm
Width
1881 mm
Width
1873 mm
Height
-
Height
1591 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1196 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Volvo EC40
Volvo EX40
VS
In the latest head-to-head comparison of the Volvo EC40 and EX40, enthusiasts will appreciate the subtle design differences and performance variations that set these two electric models apart. While the EC40 leans toward a more rugged, SUV-like stance, the EX40 offers a sleek, urban vibe with its …
Volvo EC40
Polestar 2
VS
The Volvo EC40 and Polestar 2 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Polestar 4
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Ford Mustang stands out with its iconic muscle car design and powerful engine options, appealing to traditional performance enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Polestar 2 redefines the electric vehicle landscape with its minimalist aesthetic and cutting-edge technology, …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
BYD Sealion 7
VS
The Ford Mustang Mach-E and BYD Sealion 7 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
Unsure whether the Volvo EX30 or the Volvo EC40 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Volvo EC40
Polestar 4
VS
In the highly competitive electric SUV market, the Volvo EC40 and Polestar 4 offer distinctive approaches to design and performance. The EC40 impresses with its practicality, spacious interior, and commitment to sustainability, making it a strong choice for environmentally-conscious drivers. …
BMW iX2
Volvo EC40
VS
In the burgeoning segment of electric SUVs, the BMW iX2 and Volvo EC40 stand out with their distinct design philosophies and technology offerings. The iX2 impresses with its sporty handling and luxurious interior, making it a dynamic choice for driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the EC40 emphasizes …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EC40
VS
In the burgeoning realm of electric SUVs, both the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo XC40 Recharge stand as titans of innovation and design. The Q4 e-tron offers a sophisticated driving experience with its sleek aesthetics and intuitive technology package, whereas the XC40 Recharge matches its elegance …
What drive types are available for the Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.