VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EC40 comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Volvo EC40?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EC40: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo EC40 is marginally cheaper – starting at 46,500 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,894 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EC40 is barely more efficient: consuming 16.2 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 1.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 15 km more than the Volvo EC40.

EC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers marginally more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Volvo EC40 takes 4.6 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers visibly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EC40 is only slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers visibly more boot space – 519 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries marginally more – 450 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri and the Ford Mustang Mach-E represent two very different takes on driving pleasure—one a classic sporty coupe with nostalgic charm, the other a modern all-electric crossover with high-tech performance. This comparison will help you weigh classic style and driving feel against …
Volvo EC40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo C40 and Volvo XC40 are closely related compact Volvos that deliver strong safety, premium interiors and modern tech, but they take different routes: the C40 is a coupe‑styled, electric‑first model focused on design and emission‑free driving, while the XC40 is a more conventional SUV …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
310887_Volvo_C40_Recharge_Pure_Electric

Reviews Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volvo EC40 pit a compact, city-focused electric with lively handling against a larger, comfort-oriented electric aimed at family use. This comparison highlights key differences in range, interior space, driving feel and tech to help you choose which suits your needs.
CUPRA Tavascan
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan and the Ford Mustang Mach‑E are two electric SUVs that blend sporty performance with everyday practicality, but they take very different approaches to design, driving feel and technology. This comparison will help you see how the Tavascan’s sharp handling and striking CUPRA …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EC40
VS
In the burgeoning realm of electric SUVs, both the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo XC40 Recharge stand as titans of innovation and design. The Q4 e-tron offers a sophisticated driving experience with its sleek aesthetics and intuitive technology package, whereas the XC40 Recharge matches its elegance …
Volvo EC40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo EC40 and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Volvo EC40
Volvo EX40
VS
Deciding between the Volvo C40 (commonly called the C40 Recharge) and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you prefer a coupé‑style compact electric with sharper styling or a more conventional compact electric SUV focused on practicality. This quick comparison will run through range, interior …
BMW iX2
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The BMW iX2 and Ford Mustang Mach-E compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Jaguar I-Pace
VS
In the electrifying world of electric SUVs, the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Jaguar I-Pace stand out as fierce competitors. The Mustang Mach-E impresses with its sporty handling and spacious interior, offering a versatile solution for those seeking a fusion of performance and practicality. Meanwhile, …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
46,500 - 59,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
404 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,873 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.