VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo XC40 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Mustang Mach-E or Volvo XC40 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E @ mustang.fordpresskits.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo XC40 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48400 £. That’s a price difference of around 11666 £.

XC40 @ media.volvocars.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a decisively edge – offering 487 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 290 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 3.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Mustang Mach-E performs minimal better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Mustang Mach-E pulls decisively stronger with 950 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 650 Nm difference.

Mustang Mach-E @ mustang.fordpresskits.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is evident lighter – 1688 kg compared to 2161 kg. The difference is around 473 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers somewhat more room – 519 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 67 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Mustang Mach-E performs barely noticeable better – up to 1420 L, which is about 92 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 somewhat takes the win – 532 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 82 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Mustang Mach-E is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,400
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Mustang Mach-E marks a new chapter in the legacy of the iconic American brand, combining classic muscle car aesthetics with modern electric vehicle technology. Its sleek design captures the spirit of innovation while offering a spacious and tech-savvy interior for enhanced driving comfort. The Mach-E promises an exhilarating driving experience, packed with cutting-edge features that set a new standard for electric SUVs.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW @ mustang.fordpresskits.com
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW @ mustang.fordpresskits.com
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW @ mustang.fordpresskits.com
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW @ mustang.fordpresskits.com
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW @ mustang.fordpresskits.com

Volvo XC40

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC40 is a standout model in the compact SUV segment, offering a delightful blend of Scandinavian design and practicality. Its interior is both stylish and functional, featuring premium materials and innovative storage solutions that make every journey comfortable. The car's performance is smooth and responsive, with advanced safety features ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ media.volvocars.com
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go Kuga; if you prefer a calmer, premium feel and a car that looks after you like a very fashionable safety blanket, choose the XC40.
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a plush cabin, class-leading safety tech and Scandinavian style, so pay extra if you want flair, refinement and that "I’m-driving-something-special" feeling.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo XC40
Mustang Mach-E
XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
48400 - 66900 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
73 - 91 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2161 - 2351 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4713 - 4743 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1881 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1613 - 1624 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1345 - 1420 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, the Ford Mustang Mach‑E remains the more thrilling, style-forward choice for buyers who want smiles per mile.
Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri is pure 1970s charisma — a lightweight, analogue coupe that thrills with raw charm and classic looks but asks you to forgive creature comforts, modern safety tech and everyday reliability. By contrast the Ford Mustang Mach‑E slaps Mustang attitude onto an electric, family-friendly SUV with instant torque, roomy practicality and up‑to‑date tech, so if you want future‑proof performance the Mach‑E is the smarter, cleaner way to wear a pony badge.
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers petrol, hybrid and electric options plus proven practicality. Go for the EX40 if you want cutting‑edge EV efficiency and playful agility; pick the XC40 if you value versatility, a broader engine choice and tried‑and‑tested everyday usefulness.
Toyota Corolla Cross
Volvo XC40
VS
The Toyota Corolla Cross is the sensible, wallet-friendly compact SUV that delivers Toyota reliability, efficient engines and roomy practicality for everyday life, while the Volvo XC40 trades bargain-basement charm for premium materials, sharper handling and a cocoon of Scandinavian safety tech. If you want low running costs and uncomplicated usefulness, the Corolla Cross is your no-nonsense winner; if you prefer style, advanced driver aids and a badge that subtly screams “I care about safety (and design),” splurge on the XC40.
Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its stylish Scandinavian design and commitment to safety, offering a serene driving experience complemented by a high-quality interior. On the other hand, the VW T-Roc impresses with its sportier dynamics and customizable features, appealing to drivers who prioritize a more engaging ride. Ultimately, the choice between the XC40 and T-Roc boils down to personal preferences in style, comfort, and driving experience.
CUPRA Terramar
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, catering to different preferences in the increasingly popular market.
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq and the Volvo XC40 go head-to-head in the compact SUV segment, each bringing unique advantages to potential buyers. The Karoq impresses with its practicality, offering generous cargo space and efficient engine options, making it an ideal choice for families and long journeys. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its chic Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, appealing to buyers with a penchant for style and cutting-edge technology.
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a reputation for safety and comfort. Ultimately, the decision between these two distinctive models hinges on personal preferences for driving engagement versus everyday usability.
What drive types are available for the Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.