Compare performance (281 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Ford Transit Transporter?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Ranger is markedly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,870 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers substantially more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 360 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers barely more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers noticeably more torque with 697 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 267 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Ford
|